Archive | March, 2010

The Phelpsians’ Speech, the Mohammed Cartoons, and the Slippery Slope

If the Phelpsians magically went to their reward tomorrow, public debate would suffer very little. But I think their speech needs to be protected, because allowing the restriction of such speech — especially using the “intentional infliction of emotional distress” tort — would lead to the restriction of much more valuable speech. Now it’s true, […]

Continue Reading 8

Where’s the State Action in Tort Awards Based on Speech?

Occasionally I hear people ask this question. Criminal prosecution for speech of course involves the government prosecuting and imprisoning or fining someone; injunctions of speech involve a court order barring speech; but when one individual sues another, is that really “state action” that’s governed by the First Amendment? Why isn’t it like a private employer […]

Continue Reading 7

Jury Discretion, Viewpoint Discrimination, and the Size of the Snyder v. Phelps Compensatory Damages Award

The jury awarded $2.9 million in compensatory damages to the plaintiff in Snyder v. Phelps. (It also awarded $8 million in punitive damages, which the judge reduced to $2.1 million.) Now I stress again that the speech here was extremely offensive (and, in my view, entirely unjustified); and of course the plaintiff, being a grieving […]

Continue Reading 20

Funeral Picketing and Residential Picketing

I’ve tried to explain recent posts why I think this particular verdict based on funeral picketing is unconstitutional, because the intentional infliction of emotional distress tort and the invasion of privacy tort can’t properly be used to punish such speech. But may a legislature permissibly enact statutes banning funeral picketing, perhaps by analogy to many […]

Continue Reading 10

The Phelpsians’ Picketing and Fighting Words

I’ve argued in earlier posts that the verdict against Phelps should be set aside because the intentional infliction of emotional distress tort is facially overbroad and thus unconstitutional as applied to speech. The tort might be constitutional if a court limits it to applying only to otherwise unprotected speech (such as threats, fighting words, and […]

Continue Reading 2

Invasion of Privacy and the Freedom of Speech

The Snyder v. Phelps jury held defendants liable not just for intentional infliction of emotional distress, but also for invasion of privacy. “Invasion of privacy” covers several torts, but the ones alleged here were “intrusion upon seclusion” (because the picketing was outside a funeral, albeit 1000 feet away) and “publicity given to private life” (apparently […]

Continue Reading 0

Me Too

I generally don’t like to put up “me too” posts, but I did want to express my agreement with Jonathan Adler’s (and many others’) defense of the Justice Department lawyers who, while in private practice, defended various Guantanamo detainees pro bono. As I argued in a similar controversy three years ago, I’m sure that the […]

Continue Reading 85

Supreme Court’s October Sitting: Speculation About Authorship of Remaining Opinions

With today’s decision in Bloate (pronounced “blow-tay”) v. United States, there are only four cases undecided from the October sitting: United States v. Stevens, 08-769 (the First Amendment challenge to the federal prohibition on depictions of animal cruelty); Salazar v. Buono, 08-472 (involving an Establishment Clause challenge to a cross used in a war memorial […]

Continue Reading 7

Saving the Everglades, or Saving US Sugar?

The NYT reports that Florida’s ambitious Everglades restoration plan, as actually implemented, may do more to help ag-giant US Sugar than to restore and protect the Everglades.  Although heralded when first announced, Florida has had a hard time following through on the plan. the governor’s ambitious plan to reclaim the river of grass, as the […]

Continue Reading 29

From “Nudge” to Shove

The WSJ reports on the rapid rise and apparent fall of behavior economics within the Obama Administration.  It begins: A little more than a year into its ascendancy at the White House, behavioral economics as a key policy-making tool may be on the wane. The opening weeks of the Obama administration were a coming-out party […]

Continue Reading 44

Conservatives Defend “Al Qaeda 7”

An increasing number of conservatives are criticizing the group, Keep America Safe, for its shameful ad on the “Al Qaeda 7” — political appointees in the Justice Department who represented detainees prior to their appointment.  Benjamin Wittes has also drafted a statement decrying the attacks signed by several prominent conservative attorneys, including Peter Keisler, David […]

Continue Reading 61

Where and how to try Adam Gadahn:

Taliban propagandist Adam Gadahn (a/k/a Adam Pearlman and “Azzam the American”) has been captured in Pakistan. In 2006, he was indicted for treason in the federal district court for the Central District of California. Both during and after World War II, federal courts were successfully used for treason trials for American citizens who had served as […]

Continue Reading 52

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes