Justice Stevens Still Dissenting on Flag Burning

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports on recent remarks by retired Justice Stevens about Texas v. Johnson, the decision in which the Supreme Court held 5-4, over Stevens’ dissent, that flag burning could be a form of protected political expression under the First Amendment. ¬†According tot he article, Justice Stevens still believes the majority was wrong because flag burning is an “inarticulate roar designed to antagonize” and the flag, as a symbol of the nation, is singularly “entitled to respect.”

[Hat tip: How Appealing]

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes