Archive | 2010

Comstock and National Security Detentions

Co-blogger Ken Anderson asks: Here’s my question to the VC Staff: Are there any implications of Comstock, in the hearings, briefs, arguments, suggesting that anyone involved is weighing this up at least partly in terms of implications for what it might mean down the road for a Congressional national security administrative detention statute or authority? […]

Continue Reading 9

Kindler, Gentler Cost-Benefit Analysis

In the new issue of Regulation I review Retaking Rationality: How Cost Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health by NYU’s Richard Revesz and Michael Livermore, a progressive defense of cost-benefit analysis, albeit reformed to make it more regulation-friendly.  My review is available here (beginning on the third page of the PDF).  […]

Continue Reading 6

Did the Penguins Cheat?

FSN in Pittsburgh allegedly withheld video tape from NHL officials during the review of a contested goal, only to show the video to fans after the goal had been disallowed and play resumed.  The NHL is reviewing the incident.

Continue Reading 19

How “Negro” Became a Taboo Word

In response to the controversy generated by Senator Harry Reid’s reference to “Negro dialect,” Brian Palmer has an interesting article on Slate covering the history of how “Negro” became a taboo word. I was already aware that Negro gave way to “black” in the late 1960s in part due to the influence of the Black […]

Continue Reading 162

Comstock and National Security Implications for Detention?

(Update:  Thanks to Ilya for his post above, and Orin for his comment below to this post.  Bottom line is that Comstock does not have national security implications.) Could I put a question to the VC staff who are following Comstock?  For those of us in the national security area, the whole matter of continued […]

Continue Reading 21

Google pulling out of China?

According to a variety of sources, including Google itself, it appears that Google has made a decision to pull all of its operations out of China. The official Google blog notes a number of cyber-attacks on Google infrastructure in China, apparently targeted at obtaining information about Chinese human rights activists, and notes: We have taken […]

Continue Reading 28

Assessing the Comstock Oral Argument

Corey Rayburn Yung has a detailed discussion of today’s Comstock oral argument. See here and here. He also predicts a 6-3 victory for the government. Other analysts gave widely differing predictions. Regular VC readers may recall that Comstock is the case where the government is defending a statute allowing it to civilly confine “sexually dangerous” […]

Continue Reading 29

Self-Defense and the Kansas Abortion Case

There has been lots of media attention to the Kansas abortion case, in which defendant Scott Roeder plans to tell a jury that his slaying of Wichita doctor George Tiller was voluntary manslaughter.  Typical is this New York Times article.  The defendant plans to argue that what would otherwise seem to be cold-blooded, first degree murder was in […]

Continue Reading 54

Oral Argument in United States v. Comstock

This morning I went to the oral argument at the Supreme Court for United States v. Comstock, a potentially important federalism case that we’ve blogged about here before. The issue in the case is whether Congress has the Article I power to set up a system of civil commitment for sex offenders after their federal […]

Continue Reading 53

Court Reverses in Smith v. Spisak

The Supreme Court released one opinion today — and it was not the eagerly anticipated Citizens United.  The Court released another habeas decision instead.  In Smith v. Spisak, a unanimous Court reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s grant of death-row inmate Frank Spisak’s habeas petition.  Justice Breyer wrote the opinion, and […]

Continue Reading 46

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes