Archive | June, 2011

Ninth Circuit to Hear DNA-Testing-for-Bail Requirement Case En Banc

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted rehearing en banc in United States v. Pool, a case challenging the constitutionality of requiring the arrested to submit to DNA testing before they are released on bail. A divided three-judge panel had upheld the condition. How Appealing has more here.

Continue Reading 27

Gay Athletic Group Has First Amendment Right to Limit the Number of Straight Players on a Team

From Apilado v. North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance, 2011 WL 2148816 (W.D. Wash. May 31): This case arises from the disqualification of a softball team from the 2008 Gay Softball World Series (GSWS). The event was operated by Defendant North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance (NAGAAA) and attended by Plaintiffs Steven Apilado, LaRon Charles, […]

Continue Reading 94

Court Upholds Baptists’ Right to Proselytize (and Criticize) on Sidewalks at a Religious Festival

So holds Teesdale v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill. May 26, 2011) (earlier ruling here), in a decision that is much like the one in the Dearborn, Michigan incident, though of course with a different religious group as the target: Plaintiffs … alleged that defendants interfered with their distribution of religious literature and related proselytizing […]

Continue Reading 10

Online Journalism Ethics, or, Down the Memory Hole

The New York Times apparently thought better of the statement by Jill Abramson, announcing her appointment as the new executive editor, that in “my house growing up, The Times substituted for religion.  If The Times said it, it was the absolute truth.”  I would link to the NYT article, but the quote has been deleted […]

Continue Reading 69

Prison Vouchers — part 4

This is the fourth in a series of posts serial-blogging my new article, Prison Vouchers, forthcoming in the Penn Law Review. The first post in the series is here (I recommend reading it for an overview of the entire paper), and the second post is here and the third is here. Some of the concerns […]

Continue Reading 4

Is carrying an unloaded handgun an effective means of self-defense?

Currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is Peruta v. San Diego, in which plaintiffs challenge the San Diego Sheriff’s refusal to issue concealed handgun carry permits to ordinary persons who wish to carry handguns for lawful self-defense. The district court held that the Sheriff’s actions were not Second Amendment violations because, inter alia, […]

Continue Reading 243

Prison Vouchers — part 3

This is the third in a series of posts in which I’ll be serial-blogging my new article, Prison Vouchers, forthcoming in the Penn Law Review. The first post in the series is here (I recommend reading it for an overview of the entire paper), and the second post is here. Many of the comments to […]

Continue Reading 18

$14,000 Fine (Plus Order to Apologize) in South Africa for Anti-Homosexuality Op-Ed and Cartoon

The story (which, among other things, argued that the South African Constitution should be changed to reject same-sex marriage rights) and cartoon (which suggested that recognition of same-sex marriage would logically justify recognition of human-animal marriage) are here. The account of the court decision is in the Mail & Guardian; here’s an excerpt: Former Sunday […]

Continue Reading 80

Sixth Circuit Oral Argument on the Individual Mandate

The Sixth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in its case on the constitutionality of the individual mandate. The arguments to dismiss on procedural grounds are here (30 minutes), and the arguments on the merits are here (65 minutes). I just finished listening to the merits argument, and it was an excellent discussion for anyone who […]

Continue Reading 77

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes