I mean, of course, that
The Llama of the Pampasses you never should confound
(In spite of a deceptive similarity of sound)
With the Lama who is Lord of Turkestan.
From United States v. Cassidy (D. Md. 2011) (confirmed in the print version), thus providing yet another odd Hilaire Belloc / First Amendment link (in addition to this one):
According to the Nye affidavit, A.Z. is an enthroned tulku or reincarnate master who was enthroned in 1988 as a reincarnate llama.
Or maybe I just entirely misunderstand the case.