Archive | March, 2013

Ninth Circuit Panel Overturns Murder Conviction

And a pretty conservative panel — Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge Carlos Bea, and Judge Jerome Farris (a Carter appointee who nonetheless, to my knowledge, has a fairly conservative reputation on criminal justice cases). An excerpt, from Milke v. Ryan (9th Cir. Mar. 14, 2013): In 1990, a jury convicted Debra Milke of murdering her […]

Continue Reading 0

Judge Tingling’s Ruling on the Bloomberg Soda Ban: An Example of Conservative Judicial Activism?

Let’s put aside the question of whether the ruling is in fact judicial activism, or whether it was simply a proper application of non-delegation principles.  What about “conservative?”  Emily Bazelon of Slate writes, Judge Tingling walked on by all of that in striking down the Department of Health order. And of course he’s not the […]

Continue Reading 0

Happy Pi Day!

In honor of Pi Day (3/14), I’ll share a mnemonic for 167 digits of pi, which I developed with some friends in the mid-’90s. Many people know the common mnemonic: “How I need a drink, alcoholic of course, after the tough lectures involving quantum mechanics.” Count the number of letters in each word and stick […]

Continue Reading 0

Blue Slips vs. Filibusters

In the comments to my recent judicial nomination posts, some have wondered why I insist on distinguishing between blue slips and filibusters.  So I thought I’d quickly address this point before posting on how to end the obstruction of judicial nominees.  The reason for distinguishing between filibusters and blue slips is that these two modes […]

Continue Reading 0

The Case for Drone Courts

Last month, former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the case for creating an executive branch court to oversee the use of drones for targeted killings.  In Katyal’s view, subjecting drone strikes to an Article III “drone court” would be a “mistake.”  Thus he endorsed an alternative oversight mechanism to be housed within the executive […]

Continue Reading 0

Can You Get a Restraining Order Against Someone’s Having Sex with Your Daughter (Who Is Above the Age of Consent But Under 18)?

From today’s Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision in E.C.O. v. Compton: This case concerns whether a parent may seek an extension of an abuse prevention order under G.L. c. 209A to prevent his daughter, who was sixteen years of age [and thus above the age of consent in Massachusetts] from voluntarily engaging in a sexual […]

Continue Reading 0

Repudiating the Japanese Internment Decisions

Legal scholar Peter Irons, a leading academic expert on the Japanese internment cases, has written a powerful article calling on the Supreme Court to explicitly repudiate those decisions [HT: Constitutional Law Prof blog]. Those notorious cases, most notably Korematsu v. United States, upheld the forcible detention of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans in internment camps during World […]

Continue Reading 0

Prof. Lawrence Schiffman’s Lawyer Demands Removal of Post Containing the Text of a Court Opinion

Here’s a remarkable e-mail that I received today: Law Offices of Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Harris, Waters & Waffenschmidt 161 West Third Street PO Box 215 Williamsport, PA 17701 … E-MAIL TO: Eugene Volovh [volokh@law.ucla.edu] FROM: Clifford A. Rieders, Esquire DATE: March 13, 2013 RE: Lawrence Schiffman CC: Professor Lawrence Schiffman Please be advised that the […]

Continue Reading 0

Habemus papam!

White smoke. Live video feed here. I’m predicting Angelo Scola, archbishop of Milan. UPDATE: Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina, who will be Francis? I guess he doesn’t have a number, then. UPDATE 2: Here’s Pope Francis’s Wikipedia entry. UPDATE 3: Man, Google News and the N.Y. Times don’t even have the pope’s name yet. Advantage: […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes