Archive | April, 2013

Post-Kiobel Litigation

My Mayer Brown LLP colleagues Andy Pincus and Kevin Ranlett have a very good post on the Class Defense blog about Kiobel (the Alien Tort Statute Case) and how broadly it ought to be read. Much worth checking out, if you’re at all interested in the ATS.

Continue Reading 0

Interesting New Decision About the Neutrality Act of 1794 and the Mavi Marmara Gaza Blockade Runner

From Bauer v. Marmara (D.D.C. Apr. 18, 2013): This lawsuit arises from the Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza Strip …. The plaintiff claims to have identified several ships that violated the blockade in order to provide assistance to terrorist groups in the Palestinian territories. The plaintiff thus brought suit under the Neutrality Act, a […]

Continue Reading 0

The Med Express / James Amodio Affair — What Not to Do If You’re an Online Seller (or Its Lawyer)

Paul Alan Levy has two good posts on this incident (which involves the company that sells on eBay as “med_express_sales,” not the other companies that have unfortunately similar names). From the first, which describes how Med Express filed suit against a woman based on that woman’s true statement about a problem with the firm’s deliveries […]

Continue Reading 0

Unfortunate Organization Name

The City of Othello, Washington gives us the Othello Police Department. That must be one of the places that puts on “domestic violence training.” UPDATE: For more on a related topic, see The Trojan Doctrine: Trademarks and the Law of the Horse.

Continue Reading 0

One-handed authors

Dear Harvard Law Review executive editors, Are you still enforcing the rule against unmatched “on the other hand”s, which Eugene discusses below? If so, please get rid of it; it’s stupid. I vaguely recall having tried to get rid of it in 2003, and I vaguely recall that I was unsuccessful. Sincerely, An executive editor […]

Continue Reading 0

Confessions of a Copy Editor

The Chronicle of Higher Education has an interesting and thoughtful article by Prof. Anne Curzan about her discovery that one of the supposed rules she had been enforcing for years as a copy editor was in fact not a recognized rule at all: I have had an inkling for a while now that as a […]

Continue Reading 0

Missouri v. McNeely and Exigent Circumstances to Conduct Blood Tests for Drunk Driving Cases

Today the Supreme Court handed down Missouri v. McNeely, a Fourth Amendment case involving whether the government needs a warrant to draw blood after a suspect’s arrest for drunk driving to determine the suspect’s alcohol level. The Court held that whether a warrant is required “must be determined case by case based on the totality […]

Continue Reading 0

Kiobel and Academic Fallability

Alongside the Health Care Act decision, Kiobel is an example of the professoriate failing to predict the issues that would be taken seriously by the Court both on substance and style. When the Second and Ninth Circuit began questioning “foreign cubed” suits a few years ago, the great majority of scholars dismissed such claims as […]

Continue Reading 0

SCOTUS Affirms Second Circuit Dismissal of ATS Suit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum

The US Supreme Court released its long-awaited Kiobel decision this morning, affirming the Second Circuit’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ Alien Tort Statute claims.  Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion, joined by Justices Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy.  Justice Kennedy wrote a separate concurrence; Justice Alito did likewise, joined by Justice Thomas. Justice Breyer concurred in the judgment, […]

Continue Reading

We’re right based on some rationale, we’re pretty sure…

I enjoyed the quote from the end of the takings case that Eugene pointed to yesterday: Another judge might find the magistrate judge’s opinion or this opinion inexact in this or that particular of constitutional law. Nonetheless, this Ordinance is an unmistakable, abusive, and coercive misapplication of governmental power, perpetrated to cynically evade the Constitution. […]

Continue Reading 0

George Gershwin, CISPA, and the President’s Veto Threat

This White House sure knows how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The President’s threat to veto CISPA (Download Cyber – S A P ) will likely kill cybersecurity legislation for the year. Here’s the sentence that I believe will eat away at support for the legislation among its last defenders in Silicon […]

Continue Reading 0

Interesting New Takings Clause Case

From Hillcrest Property, LLP v. Pasco County (M.D. Fla. Apr. 12, 2013): Before 2025 Pasco County must build more and larger roads to accommodate the inevitable increase in automobile traffic. Preferring to avoid the payment of “just compensation” after acquiring the necessary land by eminent domain, Pasco County has hatched a novel and effective but […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes