Archive | August, 2013

Comment Outage when Using Internet Explorer

The commenting software we’re using (Disqus) seems to be having problem on our site, for users using Internet Explorer. We’ve asked the Disqus people about this, and we’re hoping it will be fixed soon. But for now, if you’re finding comments aren’t working for you, please try with Firefox, Chrome, or some other browser; annoying, […]

Continue Reading 0

Decimating the Public Defender System

Former judges Paul Cassell and Nancy Gertner have an op-ed in today’s WSJ decrying the effects of budget constraints and sequestration on federal public defenders.  Here’s a taste: due to the combination of general budget austerity and sequestration, the federal public defender system—a model of effective indigent defense for the past 40 years—is being decimated. As […]

Continue Reading 0

House Democrat to Challenge IRS Tax-Exemption Rules

The Washington Post reports that Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) will file suit today against the Internal Revenue Service’s regulations governing what organizations qualify for tax exempt status. Current law says the organizations must engage “exclusively” in social welfare activities, but IRS tax code requires only that they are “primarily engaged” in such purposes. That discrepancy has […]

Continue Reading 0

Dean Sanctioned for Submitting False Admissions Data

Via Legal Ethics Forum comes news that former Villanova Law School Dean Mark Sargent received a three-year suspension from the Massachusetts Bar for knowingly submitting false admissions data.  Former Illinois Law DeanAssistant Dean of Admissions Paul Pless was also reprimanded by the Washington State bar. [Note: Errors to this post have been corrected.  Most significantly, as […]

Continue Reading 0

The Solicitor General’s Brief in Bond v. United States

Regular readers are familiar with Bond v. United States, the pending case that presents the question of whether, per Missouri v. Holland, a treaty can increase the legislative power of Congress. I posted about Paul Clement’s brief on behalf of Ms. Bond here, and I posted about my brief on behalf of the Cato Institute […]

Continue Reading 0

Mann v. Steyn — Mann Wins Round One

Last year, the noted (and controversial) climate scientist Michael Mann sued National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress for blog posts written by Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg and posted on National Review Online and CEI’s OpenMarket blog, respectively.  I blogged about the case in these four posts: 1, 2, […]

Continue Reading 0

Suzanna Sherry on the Case for “Judicial Activism”

Vanderbilt law professor Suzanna Sherry recently posted an interesting article on “Why We Need More Judicial Activism”, which led to a symposium at The Green Bag, and a critique by co-blogger Orin Kerr. I agree with Sherry’s main point: that we need more judicial review, not less, and that historically federal courts have erred more […]

Continue Reading 0

When Is Ignorance of Consanguinity Bliss?

For the past two days, the most-read article on Slate has been this “Dear Prudie” column about a man whose unacknowledged son is unwittingly marrying his cousin. The dispute presented to Emily Yoffe (Prudie) is whether to alert the couple that they are cousins. Yoffe’s response is a strong recommendation to keep quiet: As it […]

Continue Reading 0

My Forthcoming Book Chapter on “The Impact of Judicial Review on American Federalism”

My forthcoming book chapter, “The Impact of Judicial Review on American Federalism: Promoting Centralization More than State Autonomy,” is now available on SSRN. It will be published in Nicholas and Aroney and John Kincaid, eds., Courts in Federal Countries: Federalists or Unitarists? (Oxford University Press, forthcoming). This book examines the effects of judicial review on […]

Continue Reading 0

Catalogue vs. Catalog

My wife, son, and I were discussing “catalogue” vs. “catalog” yesterday, so naturally I turned to Google Ngrams to see actual usage in American English books over time. Here’s what I saw, again focusing only on American English books published from 1952 to 2008 (2008 being the latest year that Google Ngrams offers); I was […]

Continue Reading 0

“Plaintiffs … Reluctantly File This Action”

From Williams v. Bridgeport Music, Inc. (C.D. Cal. filed Aug. 15, 2013), aka Got to Give It Up (Marvin Gaye) & Sexy Ways (Funkadelic) v. Blurred Lines (Robin Thicke): Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple […]

Continue Reading 0

An Unhelpful Way to Measure the Consequences of Striking Down Versus Upholding Legislation: A Response to Sherry

Professor Suzanna Sherry recently posted an essay, Why We Need More Judicial Activism, arguing that we should encourage courts to strike down legislation because courts more often err by upholding legislation than by striking down legislation. The Green Bag put out a request for responses to Sherry’s article. I wrote up a response, but then […]

Continue Reading 0

Speaking of Fourth Amendment History…

In light of my last post on Fourth Amendment originalism, I thought I would make two more comments — one a recommendation and the other a question. 1) Among those doing historical work on criminal procedure, I think one scholar’s historical work that is excellent and consistently “underplaced” is Wes Oliver of Duquesne (formerly of […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes