From a brief [UPDATE: link added] quoted in Duffy v. Lusk, 2010 WL 1433481 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Apr. 8):
POINT I: THIS [IS] NOT AN INSANE LAWSUIT BROUGHT IN IGNORANCE OF ROOKER-FELDMAN PRINCIPLES OR JUDICIAL OR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.
I should note that petitioner, while acting pro se, is a lawyer.