Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defends his Rolling Stone article, and Salon‘s Farhad Manjoo responds here.
Also Salon‘s Joan Walsh answers those who’ve criticized the magazine for publishing Manjoo’s article in the first place.
Meanwhile, Democratic pollster Mark Blumenthal dissects Kennedy’s reliance upon exit poll data here, and finds it wanting.
While it covers many topics involving alleged suppression and fraud in Ohio, the article disappoints in its discussion of the exit poll controversy, because on that aspect of the controversy Kennedy manages to dredge up nearly every long-ago discredited distortion or half-truth on this subject without any acknowledgement of contrary arguments or the weaknesses in his argument. It is as if the exit poll debate of the last eighteen months never happened.
Blumenthal promises to post Part II of his critique shortly.
UPDATE: RCP’s Tom Bevan weighs in on RFK Jr’s “incredble shrinking credibility”:
Last Friday RFK, Jr. asserted on CNN, “There’s no legitimate dispute that there was a massive, concerted, deliberate effort by high level-Republican Party officials to fix the election in Ohio. And the press has not covered this issue.” This is a grotesque lie unsupported by even a shred of credible evidence, yet Kennedy is out on national cable television spewing it as gospel truth.