Author Archive | Jonathan H. Adler

“The Uneasy Case for the Affordable Care Act”

Duke law professor Stephen Sachs has a new essay. “The Uneasy Case for the Affordable Care Act,” responding to Erwin Chemerinsky on the constitutionality of the individual mandate.  Here is the abstract from SSRN: The constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act is sometimes said to be an “easy” question, with the Act’s opponents relying more […]

Continue Reading 62

Marijuana Federalism

An initiative to legalize possession of 1 ounce or less of marijuana qualified for the November ballot in Colorado yesterday.    The initiative only legalizes possession for those 21 or older, and would also make it legal to grow up to six marijuana plants in one’s home and decriminalize the licensed sale of marijuana, subject […]

Continue Reading 23

Clarence Thomas for President?

UCLA law professor Adam Winkler has an essay in The Daily Beast arguing that Republicans should consider making Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas their presidential nominee.  According to Winkler, “a Thomas candidacy would energize Republicans in a way that few other Republicans can and would steal tremendous media attention from President Barack Obama.”  Though admitting this […]

Continue Reading 35

No Obama Nominees on D.C. Circuit

Joan Biskupic reports that President Obama is likely to become the first President “in at least half a century” to complete a term without placing someone on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.  This will happen unless the Senate reverses course and opts to confirm Caitlin Halligan, or the Administration quickly nominates […]

Continue Reading 36

Climategate Turnabout Continued

The revelation that Peter Gleick of the Pacific Institute posed as a Heartland Institute board member to obtain confidential board documents and then distributed these documents, along with an almost-certainly-fake “Climate Strategy” memo continues to reverberate through climate science and policy circles.  Folks that might otherwise be discussing the new study claiming climate change could […]

Continue Reading 231

Climategate Turnabout

In 2010 and 2011 the climate science community was rocked by the release of e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit showing that climate scientists can be just as petty, political and (at times) unethical as any other group.  To this day, it has not been determined who obtained the e-mail files […]

Continue Reading 273

The STOCK Act and Whistleblowing — Round II

On Sunday, I noted John Berlau and David Bier’s concerns that the STOCK Act sweeps to broadly and could inhibit whistleblowing, and Professor Bainbridge’s thorough response.   Now Berlau and Bier’s colleague, Ryan Radia, has joined the fray, arguing in Berlau and Bier have valid concerns.  In his sur-reply, Professor Bainbridge explains why he’s still […]

Continue Reading 1

The STOCK Act and Whistleblowing

Congress appears poised to enact the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act to expressly extend the prohibition on insider trading to members of Congress and their staff.  Some argued that insider trading on Capitol Hill was already illegal, but the STOCK Act would make this explicit.  Both the House and Senate have passed versions of the […]

Continue Reading 5

From “First to Worst” on Medical Marijuana

From Rolling Stone, a report on the Administration’s escalation of the federal government’s campaign against medical marijuana.  It begins: Back when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. “I’m not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to […]

Continue Reading 51

Where’s the Contraception Compromise?

The Obama Administration’s January announcement it would not exempt most religious employers from the so-called “contraception mandate” sparked substantial controversy. The policy infuriated many religious groups, including some that have been otherwise supportive of the Administration’s health care reform efforts. In response to public pressure, last Friday the Administration announced a compromise designed to assuage […]

Continue Reading 639

Administration Again Admits Individual Mandate’s Penalty Is Not a Tax

Testifying today before the House Budget Committee, Jeffrey Zients, acting Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, acknowledged that the penalty provision used to enforce the individual mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is not a tax.  Philip Klein has details (and video) here.

Continue Reading 136

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes