Author Archive | Orin Kerr

An Unusual Argument

The Petitioner’s Reply Brief in McDonald v. City of Chicago has an interesting passage in which the Petitioners urge the Court not to rule in their favor on grounds argued by the NRA, which will be sharing argument time with the Petitioners: NRA’s novel theory, at 40, that Cruikshank did not bar the Second Amendment’s […]

Continue Reading 118

Matthew Berry Runs For Congress

My friend Matthew Berry recently announced that he is running for Congress in Northern Virginia. Specifically, he is presently running in the GOP primary in the Virginia 8th District that covers the Virginia suburbs right outside DC (Arlington, Alexandria, and Reston). The seat is presently held by Democrat Jim Moran. Matthew is the former General […]

Continue Reading 23

Reply Brief in McDonald v. City of Chicago

It’s available here. Here’s the Summary: 1. Respondents offer no coherent alternative interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, nor do they defend the reasoning of The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1873). Relying on illogical assumptions, selective quotation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s opponents and discredited scholarship, Respondents aver only that the Clause […]

Continue Reading 69

An Exchange on Comment Moderating

A few minutes ago I deleted a comment from a conservative commenter, “Gaydude,” that was an obnoxious and personal attack in response to liberal commenter “ArthurKirkland.” GayDude then wrote another comment directed to me that I think deserves a wider audience: Wait, my post criticizing Arthur’s post was removed? Oh, right, this is an Orin […]

Continue Reading 95

Awkward Moment At the State of the Union Address

President Obama criticizes the Supreme Court’s recent campaign finance case, and the Justices have to sit there silently and motionless with the cameras focused in directly on them while the rest of the room applauds Obama’s criticism: Justice Alito has the very human reaction of mouthing disagreement, but I tend to think the episode shows […]

Continue Reading 223

“Judicial Nominations in the First Year of the Obama Administration”

Tomorrow I will be participating on a panel discussion hosted by the American Constitution Society, “Judicial Nominations in the First Year of the Obama Administration,” at the National Press Club. The event is moderated by Michael Gerhardt and my co-panelists are Lynn Rhinehart of the AFL/CIO and Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center. It […]

Continue Reading 16

More on Hat Tips

I like Ilya’s default rule on hat tips. Also, I think the ideal approach when submitting a tip is to say either way if you want your name mentioned. The problem I have found is that some people really don’t want their names mentioned but others really really do. (Indeed, I have received follow-up e-mails […]

Continue Reading 5

Bad Names for Legal Blogs

It’s common for legal blogs to use some legal phrase as their title, such as Concurring Opinions, Res Ipsa Loquitur, etc. Here’s my question: What are the worst possible names for legal blogs — or at least the funniest or most awkward — based solely on widely used legal phrases? Assume the blog name has […]

Continue Reading 113

Briscoe v. Virginia Ends With a Whimper

Briscoe v. Virginia, a case on Confrontation Clause rights in criminal trials, has been one of the most closely-watched criminal law cases at the Supreme Court this Term. As detailed here, the Court’s decision to take the case suggested that it might use the case to overrule or sharply limit last Term’s major decision in […]

Continue Reading 32

Money-as-Speech Versus Speech to Get Money

Over at Slate, Temple law professor David Kairys argues that conservative judges have been inconsistent in enforcing the principle that spending money can have a speech component protected by the First Amendment. He writes: The first theory appeared in a 1976 decision, Buckley v. Valeo, which invalidated some campaign-finance reforms that came out of Watergate. […]

Continue Reading 24

Plain View for Computer Searches Generates Two Circuit Splits in Two Days: United States v. Williams and United States v. Mann

Should courts adopt a new set of Fourth Amendment rules to regulate how the police can search computers for evidence? In particular, does the fact that so much electronic evidence outside the scope of a warrant can come into “plain view” during a computer search require a different approach to whether that evidence outside the […]

Continue Reading 28

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes