In his latest post on the federalism argument against DOMA, my co-blogger Nick Rosenkranz suggests that there can be no federalism-based constitutional objection to a statute that “defines [a word] only for purposes of federal law.” According to Nick. such a definition can only be unconstitutional if it offends some substantive constraint on government power, […]
Archive | Federalism
There Is No Federalism Objection To Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act
There has been a lot of commentary about the federalism argument against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Several of my co-conspirators signed on to the “federalism brief” in the DOMA case. I expressed serious doubts about the argument a few weeks ago (as did Sasha, and Ed Whelan over at National Review Online), and […]
Whelan v. McConnell on Same-Sex Marriage
By Jonathan H. Adler on March 23, 2013 3:43 pm in DOMA, Federalism, Same-Sex Marriage, Supreme Court
On Thursday, Stanford law professor and former federal appellate judge Michael McConnell suggested the Supreme Court should avoid ruling directly on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage by denying Proposition 8’s supporters standing to defend the initiative’s constitutionality and holding that the Defense of Marriage Act exceeds the scope of federal power. NRO’s Ed Whelan, who […]
McConnell on the Same-Sex Marriage Cases
By Jonathan H. Adler on March 21, 2013 10:40 pm in DOMA, Federalism, Same-Sex Marriage, Supreme Court
In Friday’s WSJ, Stanford law professor Michael McConnell, a former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, argues that the Supreme Court should hold that Proposition 8 supporters lack standing to defend the ballot initiative in federal court and that the federal government lacks the power to define marriage. the court need […]
DOMA: “Conservative Principles, Properly Understood”
In his column for today, George Will backs the federalism-based equal protection argument against Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act that Ernie Young and Lynn Baker, along with co-Conspirators Randy, Jonathan, Ilya, and I made in an amicus brief filed in United States v. Windsor.: Conservatives who supported DOMA should, after 17 years’ […]
Sex, Drugs, Alcohol, Gambling, and Guns: The Synergistic Constitutional Effects
By David Kopel on March 16, 2013 4:21 pm in Asset Forfeiture, Constitutional History, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Federalism, Guns, Supreme Court, Symposia, Tenth Amendment, War on Drugs
That’s the title of a new article by Trevor Burrus (Cato) and me, forthcoming in a symposium issue on drug policy, from the Albany Government Law Review. The symposium title is “Overdose: The Failure of the US Drug War and Attempts at Legalization.” Here is an excerpt from the introduction: In this Article we discuss the synergistic […]
My Review of Einer Elhauge’s Obamacare on Trial
By Ilya Somin on March 11, 2013 4:45 pm in Commerce Clause, Federalism, Health Care, Individual Mandate, Necessary and Proper
The Liberty Law Blog recently posted my review of Harvard Law Professor Einer Elhauge’s book Obamacare on Trial, which was possibly the first academic book on the Obamacare litigation published by a legal scholar since the Supreme Court issued its decision in NFIB v. Sebelius. Elhauge is a topnotch scholar, and his book makes some […]
Some questions on the DOMA federalism theory
I’m also one of those who are skeptical of the federalism brief against DOMA. But I have a few questions, based on perusing the recent posts here and elsewhere by Dale, Randy, Jonathan, Nick, and my former boss Ed. (I read the brief itself a while back, but declined to sign; forgive me if the […]
Debating DOMA and Federalism
As Dale noted here, several VC contributors joined a federalism scholars amicus brief in United States v. Windsor arguing that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act transgresses the limitations on federal power. Our brief questions whether it is proper for the federal government to seek to defend a traditional conception of marriage in […]
Congress Has Power To Define The Terms Of Its Own Statutes
Last week, Dale Carpenter blogged about a particular amicus brief filed in U.S. v. Windsor, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) case. In this brief, Dale, as well as co-conspirators Jonathan Adler, Randy Barnett, and Ilya Somin, set forth a “federalism-based” argument against DOMA. With all due respect to my co-conspirators, I agree with Ed […]
A Federalism-Based Equal Protection Argument Against DOMA
By Dale Carpenter on March 1, 2013 2:43 pm in Constitutional Law, Equal Protection, Federalism, Same-Sex Marriage, Supreme Court
Over the past few days, the Court has been treated to an avalanche of briefs submitted by law professors, professional associations, prominent Republicans, and even football players arguing that California’s Proposition 8 and Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act are unconstitutional. Today I’m proud to join three of my co-Conspirators — Jonathan Adler, Randy […]
Comstock, Bond and Predictions About the Individual Mandate Case
By Ilya Somin on February 22, 2013 11:54 pm in Federalism, Health Care, Individual Mandate, Necessary and Proper
In his recent response to Randy Barnett, co-blogger Orin Kerr argues that previous precedent, especially the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in United States v. Comstock justifiably led many observers to expect that the Court would readily uphold the individual health insurance mandate, and that its failure to do so under the Commerce and Necessary and […]
One Last Clarification on Federalism and the Treaty Power
Before leaving off the subject of federalism and the treaty power, I would like to clarify one aspect of my position. In arguing, as I have from the beginning, that the treaty power cannot expand the scope of federal authority beyond that which is granted by other parts of the Constitution, I do not mean […]
More on Federalism and the Limits of the Treaty Power
We are, I thinking, nearing the end of the ongoing debate over federalism and the treaty power between guest-blogger Rick Pildes, Nick Rosenkranz, Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. My own view remains unchanged: the treaty power does not allow the federal government to make treaties that go beyond the scope of the authority granted to Congress […]
Peace Treaties & the War Power
By Eugene Kontorovich on January 27, 2013 5:19 pm in Constitutional History, Constitutional Law, Federalism, International Law, Treaties
Ilya’s response to Rick, that the Peace Treaty with Britain’s domestically applicable provisions could have been implemented through the foreign commerce power, seems right to me. But there may be another power that would have justified such legislation. Peace is the flip side of war. Thus Congress’s power to decide on war also presumably includes […]