Archive | Freedom of Speech

Is It a Crime to Publish Parody Videos That Use “Lewd … Language” Meant to “Embarrass and Emotionally Torment” Police Officers?

Yes, the Renton (Wash.) city prosecutor’s office concludes, applying the Washington “cyberstalking” statute — an excellent example of the dangers of the broad “cyberbullying” and “harassment” statutes that I have often condemned. KIRO-TV reports: The Renton City Prosecutor wants to send a cartoonist to jail for mocking the police department in a series of animated […]

Continue Reading 90

Ninth Circuit Panel Holds That Oakland Discriminatorily Enforced 8-Foot No-Approach Zone Outside Abortion Clinic

From Hoye v. City of Oakland, handed down today: Within [100-foot zones around entrances to reproductive health clinics,] the [Oakland] Ordinance makes it an offense knowingly and willfully to approach within eight feet of an individual seeking entry to the clinic if one’s purpose in approaching that person is to engage in conversation, protest, counseling, […]

Continue Reading 53

Court Dismisses Prosecution for Leaving Nasty Voice-Mails for Prosecutor, Suggests New York Telephone Harassment Statute Is Facially Unconstitutional

The case is People v. Louis, a New York trial court case decided Wednesday. This seems consistent with United States v. Popa (D.C. Cir. 1999), discussed in this post, and also (though the analogy is less direct, given the difference in the statutes involved) with the Nebraska Supreme Court People v. Drahota decision). The defendant […]

Continue Reading 35

Unprotected Solicitation of Crime or Protected Advocacy of Crime?

Marty Lederman (Balkinization) blogs about an indictment that raises very important First Amendment issues. Count 1 charges defendant with urging terrorist activity — that’s the solicitation vs. advocacy question. Count 2 charges defendant with linking to bombmaking instructions, with the intent that they be used for criminal purposes (an issue I discuss, among others, in […]

Continue Reading 11

Defendant’s Looking at Playboy and Girls Gone Wild as Sentencing Factor

In State v. Epling (Utah. Ct. App. July 21, 2011), defendant pleaded no contest to three charges of sexually abusing his stepson, and was sentenced to three consecutive 1-to-15-year prison terms. Here’s one passage that struck me as particularly interesting: Epling also objects to the trial court’s expressed concern about his involvement with “pornography.” According […]

Continue Reading 60

Never Transmit False Data in Rhode Island

R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-52-7(b) makes it a misdemeanor to “intentionally or knowingly” “make[] a transmission of false data,” or to “make[], present[] or use[] or cause[] to be made, presented or used any data for any other purpose with knowledge of its falsity.” Section 11-52-6 also makes violators civilly liable, including for punitive damages. […]

Continue Reading 39

Ninth Circuit Panel Reverses Conviction for Allegedly Threatening to Kill Then-Candidate Obama

The case is this morning’s United States v. Bagdasarian (decided by a 2-to-1 vote). On October 22, 2008, when Barack Obama’s election was looking more and more likely, Bagdasarian, under the username “californiaradial,” joined a “Yahoo! Finance — American International Group” message board, on which members of the public posted messages concerning financial matters, AIG, […]

Continue Reading 59

“Father Shall Take Down That Web Site and Shall Never on Any Public Media Make Any Reference to Mother At All,”

“nor any reference to the relationship between mother and children, nor shall he make any reference to his children other than ‘happy birthday’ or other significant school events.” That’s the text of a judge’s oral order in Morelli v. Morelli, No. A06-04-60750-C (Diane Gibbons, J., Bucks Cty., Pa. June 6, 2011). If the father says […]

Continue Reading 208

Buying Search Engine Placement Triggered by a Competitor’s Name

Habush v. Cannon, 2011 WL 2477236 (June 8), holds that such purchases can’t be enjoined under Wisconsin “right of publicity” law. Plaintiffs, Robert L. Habush and Daniel A. Rottier, are personal injury lawyers and partners in Habush Habush & Rottier. Defendants, William M. Cannon and Patrick O. Dunphy, are plaintiffs’ competitors, and partners in Cannon […]

Continue Reading 59

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes