Archive | Targeted Killing

Drone Warfare in House Subcommittee Hearing

Yesterday (Tuesday, March 23, 2010) I was pleased to appear as a witness before the House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, to discuss drone warfare and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).  The list of witnesses is here, along with a link to a webcast (which I can’t seem to open), and links to the witness […]

Continue Reading 60

Response from ACLU’s Jonathan Manes on Drones and US Forces

Jonathan Manes, the ACLU lawyer whose work and presentations I have cited a couple of times in posts here at Volokh, and someone for whom, despite some fundamental agreements, I have great respect and like very much, has responded with the following letter.  He has given me permission to post it here.  The most important […]

Continue Reading

House Subcommittee Hearing on Drone Warfare

In the midst of the healthcare debate in Congress, other business does go on (sort of), including a subcommittee hearing on drone warfare, at which I’ll be testifying, along with some other experts, including the author of the seminal Wired for War, which put the issue of robotics and war squarely on the table.  I’ll […]

Continue Reading 18

Drone Warfare and the Harvard National Security Conference

I’m writing from Cambridge, where I just finished a great short conference on targeted killing and drone warfare put on by the Harvard Law School National Security Law Society and Journal. The  presentations should go up as video one of these days I hope!) and I highly recommend them if you are studying this topic. […]

Continue Reading 24

Predators over Pakistan, My New Weekly Standard Essay

Well, “polemic” is probably closer to it.  Regular readers have been hearing about this piece for a while, and I have posted various arguments from it (concerning targeted killing and Predator drones and the CIA and armed conflict and self-defense, and my general concern that the Obama administration has embraced a policy that its lawyers […]

Continue Reading

Drones as Strategic Airpower and the Counter-Raiding Light Cavalry?

David Rittgers, a Cato legal analyst and former Special Forces officer, has an excellent op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal on the use of Predator drones.  He cautions, on the one hand, against reflexively regarding drone attacks as nonjudicial execution or, really, functionally different from other weapons that soldiers might use – as well as […]

Continue Reading 100

LA Times Op-Ed Contributors on Targeted Killing and the Presumed Mossad Hit

Over at the Los Angeles Times opinion page today, Sunday, February 21, 2010, Marjorie Miller has lined up various folks to opine on targeted killing and the presumed Mossad hit in Dubai against the founder of Hamas’ military wing.  The offerings are very short – a hundred or so words each – but I had […]

Continue Reading

Harold Koh Discussion with John Bellinger on International Law and the Obama Administration

Harold Koh, Legal Adviser to the State Department, held an informal public discussion a couple of days ago with his predecessor from the Bush administration, John Bellinger.  This was an American Society of International Law event, held at John’s law firm, Arnold & Porter, and moderated by my old friend and ASIL’s Treasurer, Nancy Perkins. […]

Continue Reading 104

Interrogating the CIA

I just finished up the initial draft of an essay for the Weekly Standard on drone warfare, self defense, and the CIA, riffing off of my chapter in Ben Wittes’s book.  One of my observations is that the Obama administration (and really the whole US government) seems to be remarkably sanguine about the other shoe […]

Continue Reading 61

More Predator Drone Debate, in the Wall Street Journal, and What the Obama Administration Should Do as a Public Legal Position

The Wall Street Journal has a weekend editorial on the same topic as my National Journal post below, Drone Wars, January 9, 2010.  Interestingly, I find myself believing that the WSJ editorial gets it, if not precisely wrong, at least puts the emphasis exactly backwards.  The WSJ editorial is primarily concerned to defend the “war” frame […]

Continue Reading 68

National Journal on Targeted Killing and Predator Drone Strikes

(Update:  Thanks, Glenn, for the Instalanche!  Please see the further post above, on what I think the US legal position ought to be – what the Obama administration should be stating as its view of the relevant international law, and how I think the WSJ’s op-ed today in defense of drone strikes is not actually […]

Continue Reading 167

Yemen, Somalia and ….

Following up on Eric’s post re President Obama’s legal authority to target in Yemen …  I’m a bit of a broken record on the need for the United States government to articulate a more coherent legal basis for its targeted killing.  But it is just more so since the Christmas terrorist attack … the range […]

Continue Reading 24

Should CIA Drone Operators Worry?

If this short report in Newsweek is true, then I think I would worry about legal liability more than before, if I were a CIA officer involved in Predator drone strikes.  I would have a much greater level of concern that the administration would not back me up in case of an indictment in a […]

Continue Reading 78

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes