Archive | Uncategorized

Fred Thompson vs. The UN’s anti-self-defense campaign

Earlier this week, Sen. Fred Thompson wrote to Field & Stream magazine, criticizing the UN’s campaign against the human right of self-defense. The Thompson campaign touted the letter on its website, and the letter got a favorable reception among many pro-Second Amendment bloggers. The Thompson letter, including its quotation of the great Dutch philosopher of […]

Continue Reading 92

Compromise by Addition:

President Bush vetoed the pork-laden $23.2 billion water project bill yesterday. The bill was the product of compromise between the House and Senate. According to the WSJ, the House passed a $14 billion bill, and the Senate passed a $15 billion bill. Each house sought to preserve its own earmarks, so at conference they compromised, […]

Continue Reading 26

DoJ Official Waterboarded:

Acting assistant attorney general Dan Levin apparently asked to be waterboarded when evaluating its legality, according to ABC News. After the experience, Levin told White House officials that even though he knew he wouldn’t die, he found the experience terrifying and thought that it clearly simulated drowning. Levin, who refused to comment for this story, […]

Continue Reading 99

TSA Tipped Off:

From the Washington Post: The Transportation Security Administration promotes its programs to ensure security by using undercover operatives to test its airport screeners. In one instance, however, the agency thwarted such a test by alerting screeners across the country that it was under way, even providing descriptions of the undercover agents. The government routinely runs […]

Continue Reading 13

Follow Up on Usury Post:

I wasn’t following the comments on my “In Defense of Usury” post, since it was primarily just an excerpt from Karlan and Zinman’s argument. I confess that I was surprised to see that there were so many comments and so much controversy about the study described in the Wall Street Journal column. Also, I apologize […]

Continue Reading 38

Schumer & Feinstein to Support Mukasey:

Whether or not the Bush Administration is making bad arguments in defense of Judge Mukasey’s nomination, it now looks likely he will be confirmed as the next U.S. Attorney General. The Washington Post is reporting that Senators Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein will vote in favor of his confirmation.

Continue Reading 9

Katyal on Goldsmith’s Terror Presidency:

Georgetown law professor Neil Katyal has an extensive review of Jack Goldsmith’s The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration in The New Republic. It should be available to non-subscribers who register, and it is worth a read. The review begins: Jack Goldsmith’s book is quite possibly the first sober account of the […]

Continue Reading 36

Althouse on Danforth v. Minnesota:

Ann Althouse has authored two very interesting posts on the recently argued Supreme Court case, Danforth v. Minnesota. First, she wrote, “Can state courts choose to apply new rules of federal constitutional law retroactively?“, and then, after reading the argument transcript, she added “When the Supreme Court announces a “new rule” of constitutional law, does […]

Continue Reading 25

Oh, Please:

President Bush is now complaining that Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey is being treated ‘unfairly’ because some Senate Democrats are opposing his nomination based on his failure to state a position about the lawfulness of waterboarding:   The White House began a campaign Thursday to save the candidacy of Michael B. Mukasey for attorney general, with […]

Continue Reading 204

UCLA Law School + RAND Corporation:

I’m pleased to say that we seem to be teaming up in a pretty systematic way. The kickoff event for the partnership is today’s conference on secrecy and transparency in the civil justice system; California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron George and 9/11 compensation fund Special Master Ken Feinberg will be speaking, among others. Cool.

Continue Reading 3

How Useful is the Concept of “Judicial Activism”?

In considering Thomas Miles and Cass Sunstein’s effort to measure “judicial activism” and the criticism it has generated, I am increasing persuaded that it is impossible to define “judicial activism” in a way that is both 1) useful, and 2) not simply a synonym for incorrect decisions. My tentative sense is that any ideologically or […]

Continue Reading 31

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes