The Volokh Conspiracy - Warren Court Critic:

Guess who made the following statements recently:

  "I always felt that judges should interpret law, not make law," he said. "I remember in college and law school in the late 60's and early 70's, even though I agreed with the substance of the Warren Court's decisions, I thought that some of them were making law."
  Not, [he] quickly added, with civil-rights rulings like the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which was issued in 1954. But the Warren Court also greatly strengthened defendants' protections against police searches.
  "I think they went too far on criminal law," [he] said.

The answer is

(here)

	[Orin Kerr, November 2, 2005 at 12:50pm] Trackbacks Warren Court Critic: Guess who made the following statements recently: "I always felt that judges should interpret law, not make law," he said. "I remember in college and law school in the late 60's and early 70's, even though I agreed with the substance of the Warren Court's decisions, I thought that some of them were making law." Not, [he] quickly added, with civil-rights rulings like the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which was issued in 1954. But the Warren Court also greatly strengthened defendants' protections against police searches. "I think they went too far on criminal law," [he] said. The answer is (here) (Senator Charles Schumer, D-NY. Source: The New York Observer) .