An interesting post from a law professor blog, written by a professor who teaches in South Carolina:
South Carolina's state govt is only the fifth most dysfunctional state govt in the nationIt's often difficult to tell whether a post is serious or sarcastic, but here the last sentence seems pretty clearly sarcastic -- and it doesn't hurt that the "Posted in" links below include "Yep, sarcasm" (as well as "Feminism and Politics" and "The Underrepresentation of Women"). So I take it that the assertion is that it's not a coincidence that South Carolina has both dysfunctional state government and a low number of women in state government.At least according to this article, which claims the six states with the worst leadership are:
6. California
5. South Carolina
4. Alaska
3. Illinois
2. Nevada
1. New YorkI'm sure the fact that we have the fewest women in state government in the nation is only a coincidence.
As it happens, though, the very item that the post links to helps check that assertion; we can see the rankings along the women-in-state-government metric for each of the six states, and not just South Carolina. Here they are: New York is #22; Nevada is #12; Illinois is #17; Alaska is #27; South Carolina is #50; California is #15. The average is just a titch below #25. Likewise, if one averages together the percentages of women in the state legislature in those six states, one gets 23.83%, almost indistinguishable from the nationwide 23.5% average.
Naturally, it's possible that other data that's out there does show that some correlation between dysfunctional government and a low number of women in government. Perhaps it might even show causation; who knows? But the data that the post links to -- if one looks at all six states, and not just the fifth state of those six -- shows no correlation at all.