Archive | March, 2010

Ravitch on Education Policy

The Times has an interesting story on Diane Ravitch’s abandonment of many strategies for improving education associated with “conservatives.” I support some of these strategies, like trying to inject markets and competition into the educational system, and oppose others, like national standardized testing, which I suspect may raise the lowest common denominator, but be the […]

Continue Reading 68

Cross-Examining Frank Easterbrook

Something to be avoided in the best of circumstances, and a particularly bad idea here. Judge Easterbrook testified yesterday as a witness, as did Judges Posner and Bauer, in the threat prosecution of Hal Turner. Turner had written a blog post saying that Easterbrook, Posner, and Bauer should be killed for their panel decision holding […]

Continue Reading 91

Al Qaeda Seven Unmasked!

It seems that the folks at Fox News have successfully unmasked the Al Qaeda Seven — you know, the terrorist-loving lawyers presently working for the Obama Justice Department. All had their names on the front page of public filings in prominent cases, which is how Fox was able to discover their identities. As far as […]

Continue Reading

Feb. 29, 1900

Here’s something you don’t often see: Birth: Feb. 29, 1900 This was in a brief biography of a Nobel-Prize-winning poet. It was a Tuesday, I think. UPDATE: People who think I’m just pointing out an amusing typo underestimate my subtlety.

Continue Reading 43

Like I Always Say: Nothing’s Harder to Predict than the Future

Here, in case you were wondering, is Clifford Stoll’s explanation in Newsweek, circa 1995, for why the Internet will fail. “Visionaries see a future of telecommuting workers, interactive libraries and multimedia classrooms. They speak of electronic town meetings and virtual communities. Commerce and business will shift from offices and malls to networks and modems. And […]

Continue Reading 49

Hyphenation, Descriptivism, and Rules

Prof. Geoffrey Pullum (Language Log) has a post that strikes me as so apt that it’s worth quoting at length, though with some extra emphasis on my part (see the original for the links, reader comments, and some more text): See Plethoric Pundigrions for screen shots showing a version of Microsoft Word (I don’t know […]

Continue Reading 25

Hey Orin

Yesterday, Orin wrote: But unless you believe, as does my co-blogger Randy, that the Constitution if properly construed mandates libertarianism o’er the land. . . . Hey Orin. Given that you insist you have no expert view on the original meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, how do you know that Richard L. Aynes, […]

Continue Reading

The Good Faith Exception and Changing Law: The Costs of the Exclusionary Rule, and Balancing Costs and Benefits

This is my third post in a planned series on why the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply when a police officer conducts a search that is lawful when it occurs that is later ruled unlawful before the conviction is final. This issue is being litigated all over the country right […]

Continue Reading 21

“Reasonable regulation” and McDonald

The following exchange took place during James Feldman’s oral argument today, on behalf of the Chicago government, in McDonald v. Chicago: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Would you be happy if we incorporated it and said, reasonable regulation is part of the incorporation? And how do we do that? MR. FELDMAN: Well, there is the reasonable regulation standard, […]

Continue Reading 113

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes