Archive | May, 2010

New lawsuit on Obamacare

Just filed in the Northern District of Ohio. (HT Jacob Sullum, of Reason.) Lead attorney is Jonathan Emord, formerly a Vice-President at Cato, and head of a firm with extensive experience in litigation against the Food and Drug Administration and other federal agencies on medical issues. The complaint is here. In the complaint, the material […]

Continue Reading 134

Unless the Justices Start Skinny-Dipping in the Cert Pool

I don’t care whether they’re straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered, queer, questioning, two-spirit, men-who-have-sex-with-men, womyn-loving-womyn, autosexual, or beyond categorization. I know it matters to some gay-rights activists who think every gay nominee is practically gay-bashing unless she starts her testimony with, “I am a gay American judicial nominee…” I know it matters to some anti-gay-rights activists […]

Continue Reading

Bisexual Erasure

I don’t think we should choose our Supreme Court Justices based on their sexual orientation. I admire Elena Kagan’s scholarship [UPDATE: link added], expect to disagree with many of her votes on legal issues, and hope that some of her votes will be ones that I will like, all without regard to her sexual orientation. […]

Continue Reading 136

Michael Bellesiles and the Bogus NRA Conspiracy

Eugene [Volokh] quotes from an editor at the New Press who is peddling the ridiculous notion that [Michael] Bellesiles was a victim of an NRA conspiracy instead of someone who destroyed his own career by writing a book (Arming America) that did not hold up when some of us checked his evidence, including work based […]

Continue Reading

More on “Weight Classes” for Prison Inmates

In a recent post, I endorsed economist Bryan Caplan’s “weight class” plan for reducing prison rape by separating prisoners by size and weight. It turns out that Columbia law student Philip Ellenbogen developed the same idea in a 2009 article for the Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems (see esp. pp. 363-68). As he […]

Continue Reading 32

Guns and Mental Illness

Title 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4) criminalizes gun possession by (among others) anyone “who has been committed to a mental institution.” This includes relatively brief commitments, and from 1992 until 2007 this covered anyone who had ever been so committed, with no opportunity for relief. Title 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) did authorize the Secretary of Treasury […]

Continue Reading 39

More Musing on Liquidity and Solvency Distinctions in Sovereign Debt Crises

I want to return again briefly to how the traditional distinction of liquidity and insolvency in a crisis applies to sovereign states such as Greece.  Liquidity is usually thought of as a gap in information that causes investors, creditors, depositors or others to suddenly question an institution’s financial position. In the classic bank run, the […]

Continue Reading 7

Kagan and Diversity Hiring

I admire the fact that Elena Kagan made it a point to hire prominent libertarians and conservatives while she was dean at Harvard. It’s difficult to get many American law schools, dominated by a broadly and comfortably liberal consensus across almost every field, to recognize the importance of ideological diversity among faculty. That’s true for hiring both […]

Continue Reading 39

Another European Prosecution for Insulting Religion

[Polish pop star Dorota Rabczewska, also known as] Doda is accused by the prosecutor’s office of the capital [Warsaw] of insulting the religious feelings of others, including by calling the authors of the Bible “drunks and drug addicts.” For this, the popular singer is facing up to 2 years in prison. On April 30, the […]

Continue Reading 41

Seeking Constitution Trivia Buffs

The Green Bag 2d is publishing a set of trivia-ish questions I put together related to the text of the Constitution; and it would be great if a few people who like such things could try to answer the questions, and let me know whether they think the instructions are flawed or imprecise in certain […]

Continue Reading 0

One Thing We Know About Elena Kagan’s Views on Particular Free Speech Cases

As I’ve mentioned before, we don’t know much about Elena Kagan’s views on particular free speech cases, largely because much of her work has been analysis and synthesis of existing doctrine, rather than prescription about the way things ought to be. That’s a perfectly sensible approach, since the analytical components of an article are generally […]

Continue Reading 32

A Tip for Lawyers

Try to avoid behavior that leads judges to officially castigate you in their court opinions. From Sullivan v. Chappius, No. 09-CV-6178L (W.D.N.Y. May 4, 2010): It appears that the reason why the complaint here alleges that plaintiff’s speech was protected under the First Amendment, even though it does not assert a claim under the First […]

Continue Reading 16

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes