Archive | 2010

The First Amendment in the Classroom

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected a teacher’s claim that a local school board violated her First Amendment right “to select books and methods of instruction for use in the classroom without interference from public officials” by failing to renew her contract after a series of conflicts over her choice of reading assignments for […]

Continue Reading 280

Time to Codify a Miranda Exception for Terrorists?

Today at 12:15 at the University of Utah College of Law I will be debating my colleague Amos Guiora about whether Miranda rights should be extended to terrorists.  I have previously blogged here and here about my view that Miranda’s “public safety” exception means that law enforcement officers investigating terrorist incidents need not give Miranda warnings.  […]

Continue Reading 88

Apples and Oranges

I’ve long dissented from the claim that it’s hard to compare apples and oranges: We compare apples and oranges all the time! We compare them by price, by how much we like the taste, by likely sweetness and ripeness, by how well they’ll go in a tasty fruit cocktail, and so on. In fact, every […]

Continue Reading 47

Vampire Slayers and the Law

Co-blogger Eugene Volokh recently referenced some criminal laws relating to Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In this 2007 post, I considered the implications of the show for property rights and “quick take” condemnations. Unlike Eugene, I managed to incorporate Faith into my legal analysis as well. As I pointed out, eminent domain abuse is an excellent […]

Continue Reading 12

May Courts Interpret Contracts Under Religious Law (Islamic Law, Jewish Law, Canon Law, etc.)?

In an earlier thread, reader frankcross asks: Suppose parties call for Islamic law and specified a judicial forum. If a court shied away from deciding that, it would leave the issue unresolved. Essentially you would be denying judicial review to parties who wanted a court to use religious law and to resolve the question. Which […]

Continue Reading 22

John Louth of OUP Guestblogging at Opinio Juris

Some VC readers, particularly academics, might be interested in the guest posts going up this week at Opinio Juris by John Louth, the editor in chief of academic law at Oxford University Press, thanks to the good offices of OJ’s Kevin Jon Heller.  Mr. Louth is guest-posting on international law publishing, but much of what […]

Continue Reading

Ninth Circuit Stays DADT Injunction

At the request of President Obama’s Justice Department, the Ninth Circuit has stayed, at least for now, an order from California District Judge Virginia Phillips halting enforcement of DADT. The Ninth Circuit panel consisted of Judges O’Scannlain, Trott and Fletcher. The order states: This court has received appellant’s emergency motion to stay the district court’s October 12, […]

Continue Reading 185

Islamic Law in U.S. Courts

I just came across an interesting case, Rahman v. Hossain (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.), which was apparently handed down June 17, but which just appeared on Westlaw. An ex-husband was demanding the return of a $12,500 “mahr” payment that was made at the time of the marriage. The parties had apparently agreed to be […]

Continue Reading 39

The Grading Scale for “Internal Use Only” at Harvard Law

From the Harvard Law Record: Harvard Law School has shifted its grade publication policy again, according to Student Government representatives who met with Dean Martha Minow last week. The new 5.0 GPA scale that the Law School will use to calculate Latin Honors will no longer appear on the reverse side of current students’ official […]

Continue Reading 25

Bleg: Ronald Reagan called an extremist in 1966

I respectfully request quotes and citations for 1st-time California gubernatorial candidate Ronald Reagan being called an “extremist” (or something similar) during his 1966 campaign, in which he unseated incumbent Pat Brown (father of Jerry Brown). Any reputable citations in books, newspapers, etc., would be fine. Video, if such video exists, would be especially great. Thanks!

Continue Reading 27

“In the Lawful Defense of the Slayer”

Buffy fans might be pleased to know that Nevada self-defense law and Washington self-defense law state that homicide is “justifiable when committed” “[i]n the lawful defense of the slayer.” Well, all state laws say that in essence, but Nevada and Washington actually use the word “slayer.” Those with a taste for the vivid might also […]

Continue Reading 35

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes