Archive | June, 2011

Animal Cruelty Laws and Religious Objections

A commenter on the goth cat thread wrote: So there are laws against mutilating non-consenting cats but not against mutilating non-consenting infant humans [alluding to male circumcision]? I suppose you could mutilate cats if that were part of your religion and you had a book from god to prove it? Another commenter responded, “yes you […]

Continue Reading 35

Piercing Your Cats Can Be Cruel

So holds a Pennsylvania appellate court in Commonwealth v. Crawford, where the defendant tried to turn ordinary cats into “gothic cats” in all sorts of unpleasant ways. The court doesn’t say that all animal piercing and tail removal is necessarily a violation of animal cruelty laws, but that these particular piercings (and dockings) were; and […]

Continue Reading 61

California Bankruptcy Court Holds DOMA Unconstitutional

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, in an opinion signed by 20 of the court’s 25 judges, has held that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally bars a married same-sex couple from filing a joint bankruptcy petition. The issue arose when the couple, one of 18,000 such […]

Continue Reading 126

Debating Sosa in Ali Shafi v. Palestinian Authority

Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of several claims filed against the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) under the Alien Tort Statute. Chief Judge Sentelle wrote the opinion for the Court, and summarized the case as follows: Appellant Ali Mahmud Ali Shafi and […]

Continue Reading 0

Rise of the Dictionaries

In today’s NYT, Adam Liptak reports on a new study by CUNY’s Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier and Arizona superior court judge Samuel Thumma, published in the Marquette Law Review, documenting the increasing use of dictionaries by Supreme Court justices in their opinions. In May alone, the justices cited dictionaries in eight cases to determine what legislators […]

Continue Reading 60

Petition for Rehearing Filed in United States v. Nosal, the Ninth Circuit Case on Criminalizing Violations of Computer Use Policies

A petition for rehearing was recently filed in United States v. Nosal, the Ninth Circuit decision holding that an employee who violates his employer’s computer use policy is guilty of “exceeding authorized access” to the employer’s computer. I have posted a copy here. I hope the Ninth Circuit grants rehearing, as I think the Nosal […]

Continue Reading 28

Country Names

How many of these countries can you identify? “Grand Duchy of __.” “__ Federation.” “__ Confederation.” “United __ States.” “Oriental Republic of __.” “Plurinational State of __.” “Co-operative Republic of __.” “Federative Republic of __.” “Bolivarian Republic of __.” “Republic of the Union of __.” “Hashemite Kingdom of __.” “State of __, Abode of Peace.” […]

Continue Reading 70

Fifth Circuit Invalidates City Zoning Ordinance that Treats Churches Less Favorably than Similar Secular Land Uses

In its recent decision in Elijah Group v. City of Leon Valley, the federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit invalidated a city zoning ordinance that forbade churches in an area where very similar secular land uses are permitted. The court ruled that the ordinance violates the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons […]

Continue Reading 20

Early Man and the Law

In Friday’s Ex Parte E.R.G., the Alabama Supreme Court struck down the Alabama grandparent visitation statute, holding that it violated the rights of parents. The decision was a splintered 4-3-2 decision, which reflects the Supreme Court’s splintered decision in Troxel v. Granville (2000) — which held that some such laws are unconstitutional, but didn’t decide […]

Continue Reading 170

The Constitutional Rights of Illegal Aliens, Under the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments

In today’s United States v. Portillo-Munoz, a divided Fifth Circuit panel holds that illegal aliens don’t have Second Amendment rights because they’re not part of “the people,” and suggests that they may lack Fourth Amendment rights as well. (The same logic might apply to the First Amendment’s Petition Clause, which also mentions a right of […]

Continue Reading 115

Third Circuit (En Banc) Opines on K-12 Students’ Off-Campus Speech Rights

The long-awaited decisions are J.S. v. Blue Mountain School Dist. (decided by an 8-to-6 vote) and Layshock v. Hermitage School Dist. (unanimous); both were just handed down this morning. Here’s a quick summary, though the opinions are long and complicated, so my quick summary must necessarily omit many important details. 1. To begin with, here’s […]

Continue Reading 54

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes