Archive | October, 2012

Fuzzy Math All Around

GOP Presidential candidate has been roundly criticized for putting forward a budget plan that doesn’t add up. His proposal to cut income tax rates by 20 percent across the board, when combined with other tax pledges (such as reducing the corporate tax rate and eliminating the AMT) would total an estimated $5 trillion, and there’s […]

Continue Reading 0

The First Amendment and Free Online Courses [UPDATE: Minnesota Backs Down]

The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that Minnesota has barred Coursera from offering free online courses — including ones that don’t even result in a degree — because it hasn’t properly registered as an educational institution with the Minnesota Office of Higher Education, and, presumably, because the universities and colleges that provide classes through Coursera […]

Continue Reading 0

10,640

This number can be seen, if you’re imaginative, as representing a particular online work (or set of works, if you prefer to view it that way). Which one? [UPDATE: Please explain your answer.]

Continue Reading 0

Posner on Amar’s Unwritten Constitution: “Extremely Strange”

Judge Richard Posner offers a rather harsh critique of Akhil Amar’s new book The Unwritten Constitution in a video presentation recorded yesterday that you can watch here, hosted by the Columbia chapter of the Federalist Society. Posner argues that Amar’s theory is just an effort to recast the Constitution into whatever Amar likes as a […]

Continue Reading 0

First Amendment, Alive and Well in Nebraska

Yesterday, the federal district court in Nebraska issued its decision declaring most of Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registry statute unconstitutional as an abridgement of the freedom of speech protected by the 1st Amendment.  I was the Plaintiffs’ Expert in the case, so I was delighted with the outcome (and I will oh-so-discreetly point you to footnote […]

Continue Reading 0

Does DOMA Discriminate on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender, or Both?

Today’s Second Circuit decision striking down a part of the Defense of Marriage Act holds that laws discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation are subject to heightened “intermediate” scrutiny. But it is not clear that DOMA actually discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, as opposed to gender. As I explained in the context […]

Continue Reading 0

Diversity

A local law firm is coming to our law school to do some recruiting, and the memo posted around the school notes that the firm has a “Diversity Scholarship” program, and goes on to say:  “Women and Diverse Students Encouraged to Apply.” Aargh.  There are no “diverse students” here, or anywhere else — diversity is […]

Continue Reading 0

Second Circuit Strikes Down DOMA Section 3

In a 2-1 opinion by Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs, a conservative appointed by the first President Bush, the Second Circuit has joined the unanimous chorus of federal courts striking down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages legalized by individual states.  The dissenter was Judge Chester Straub, who was appointed […]

Continue Reading 0

Robo-Doctors? Or Robo-Nurses?

Wired (H/T Instapundit) has a nice article by Daniela Hernandez on the coming of “robo-doctors.” Not  yet quite what our sci-fi imaginations desire, but still an important development on its own terms: Charlie Huiner, the vice president of InTouch Health care … sees robo-docs rising … His company is developing robots that allow doctors to […]

Continue Reading 0

The Knockoff Economy and the Power of Performance and Brands

In our last post, we discussed a variety of industries in which we see creativity without much resort to patent or copyright law. And we offered some explanations for how low-IP creativity works, such as informal social norms and first mover advantage. In today’s post, we look at a couple of additional ways in which […]

Continue Reading 0

E = mc^2 + 50

Where did he get that 50, you ask? Well you might. Lawyers ask similar questions when judges making common law or constitutional law draw numerical lines, though sometimes there are plausible answers to such questions. Hebrew University of Jerusalem v. General Motors LLC (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012) offers an interesting illustration. Hebrew University stemmed […]

Continue Reading 0

A Final Post on Hacking Back

Thanks to Stewart for the interesting exchange on the (un)lawfulness of hacking back. Here are my concluding thoughts. First, Stewart repeatedly draws analogies to the law of physical trespass that are faulty because they misunderstand the law of physical trespass. Stewart seems to think that it is legal to break into someone else’s house to […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes