Archive | February, 2013

DNA Collection After Arrest: A Few Thoughts on Maryland v. King

On February 26, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Maryland v. King, a case about the constitutionality of DNA collection and analysis. The case presents the latest skirmish in an ongoing debate in Fourth Amendment law: Should the reasonableness of Fourth Amendment searches be analyzed through the traditional default rule that a search […]

Continue Reading 0

When Campaign Contributions Are a Crime

It’s not every day a federal judge cites Jesse Unruh and Herodotus in the same opinion, but that’s what Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit did in his opinion for the court in United States v. Terry, a Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas judge’s appeal of an honest […]

Continue Reading 0

Immigrants as Our “Future Rulers”: Does the Danger of Political Externalities Justify Restrictions on Immigration?

In a recent post, co-blogger Eugene Volokh raises an important potential objection to unconstrained migration – the danger that immigrants with abhorrent values will become our “future rulers”: The bottom line is that for all the good that immigration can do… unregulated immigration can dramatically change the nature of the target society. It makes a […]

Continue Reading 0

National Jurist to Correct Rankings, But Keep Ratemyprofessors.com

National Jurist will revise its much-maligned law school rankings, according to an announcement from NJ editor Jack Crittenden on the publication’s website.  Although NJ defends its decision to rely upon Rateemyprofessors.com for 20 percent of each school’s rating (for those schools for which sufficient data is available), it has acknowledged some data disparities and is going to revisit the […]

Continue Reading 0

Opinions to watch for: FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System

On November 26, the Supreme Court heard arguments in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., which means that an opinion should be coming down the pike fairly soon. I’m interested in this case for three reasons: (1) it’s relevant to antitrust, which is an interest of mine (I studied Industrial Organization in grad school […]

Continue Reading 0

Symposium on the Battle of Hoth

Following up on Spencer Ackerman’s critique of Imperial strategy at the Battle of Hoth, Wired magazine has posted a symposium on the battle with commentary from six defense policy experts. I myself commented on Ackerman’s article here. I’m not entirely convinced by the symposium participants who argue that Darth Vader actually had a good strategy […]

Continue Reading 0

Immigration Policy: The Big Picture

Two questions I thought I’d ask readers: (1) How many people in the world do you think would like to move to the U.S. over the next, say, 30 years, if it were legal for them to move here and work here? Assume that in that time the U.S. will sometimes be booming and sometimes […]

Continue Reading 0

The Pilgrims as Illegal Aliens

The Daily Caller posts about a U.S. Department of Agriculture “Cultural Sensitivity Training” that, among other things, says the Pilgrims were “illegal aliens.” (Thanks to InstaPundit for the pointer.) It reminds me of a Conrad editorial cartoon from the L.A. Times that I blogged about ten years ago: An American Indian is carrying a sign […]

Continue Reading 0

Human Rights Watch Can’t Wait to Accuse Israel

Human Rights Watch has just released a report on Israel’s recent “Pillar of Defense” operation to suppress rocket fire from Gaza. The report concludes that 18 airstrikes violated international law by not being properly targeted. I do not know if 18 is a little or a lot for an operation of this scale, as there […]

Continue Reading 0

Ronald Dworkin RIP

As Orin noted, today comes the news that Oxford NYU Professor Ronald Dworkin has passed away. I was a student in Dworkin’s jurisprudence class when he visited Harvard Law School, and remember fondly him debating my torts professor Charles Fried who questioned him from the student seats.  I thought then that Dworkin clearly won those exchanges. […]

Continue Reading 0

The Scope of Federal Power Under the Thirteenth Amendment

My wife Alison Somin and University of San Diego law professor Gail Heriot have published a short article in Engage criticizing recent claims that the Thirteenth Amendment, which bans “slavery” and “involuntary servitude,” and authorizes Congress to pass “appropriate” enforcement legislation, actually gives Congress broad authority to legislate on a wide range of other issues: […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes