Archive | July, 2013

Just Compensation Problems with the City of Richmond’s Plan to Use Eminent Domain to Condemn Mortgages

In my previous post on the the California city of of Richmond’s plan to use eminent domain to condemn underwater mortgages, I noted that the plan is likely to be permissible under the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London, which says that a taking is for a constitutional “public use,” so […]

Continue Reading 0

Poverty and Child Custody

An interesting Appellate Court of Illinois decision, Cole v. Johnson (Ill. App. Ct. July 23, 2013) (some paragraph breaks rearranged); see, in particular, the last three paragraphs: The petitioner is Cody Cole, and the respondent is Kathryn Anne Johnson. They live in Paris, Illinois, and have a two-year-old son, L.C. They were engaged to be […]

Continue Reading 0

Government Releases “Primary Order” for Telephony Metadata Under FISA Section 215

Readers will recall that when Glenn Greenwald released the FISC order indicating that the NSA was getting all domestic telephony metadata, that order was designated the “secondary order.” We have since heard that there was a “primary order” covering what the government is allowed to do with the data obtained under the “secondary order.” The […]

Continue Reading 0

Doubling McDonald’s Salaries

Let’s say McDonald’s decided to double all its salaries, so that the entry-level wage became $16 an hour instead of $8 an hour. Why would McDonald’s continue to employ their $8 an hour workers when instead they could hire “better” workers who are worth more? (And those of you who think that the skills, linguistic […]

Continue Reading 0

About that McDonald’s “Study”

HuffPo: McDonald’s could double all salaries and would only have to raise prices by 17 percent. Not quite. Tom Maguire takes the story apart. He also asks the obvious question: If McDonald’s could raise prices without lowering sales, why haven’t they done it already? UPDATE: The Huffington Post has now replaced the original story with […]

Continue Reading 0

Hoosiers

When writing the Brewington amicus brief, which we filed before the Indiana Supreme Court, I used the term “Indianan” in my first draft. Yes, I’d heard of “Hoosier,” but I thought it was a jocular colloquialism, and “Indianan” was the Proper Dignified Lawyerly Way to say it. Boy, was I wrong, as Michael Sutherlin, Dan […]

Continue Reading 0

Lawmakers Upset with PPACA as It Applies to Them

Today’s NYT had an amusing story about how members of Congress and their staffs are concerned about a provision in the PPACA that requires them to obtain insurance through exchanges because, among other things, it will require a substantial increase in out-of-pocket costs. Under a wrinkle that dates back to enactment of the law, members […]

Continue Reading 0

Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Suit Against Cooley Law

Today, in MacDonald v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the SIxth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit by several former students at the Thomas M. Cooley Law School. Here’s the court’s summary of its opinion. The plaintiffs, twelve graduates of the Thomas M. Cooley Law School, sued their […]

Continue Reading 0

Hearing on IRS Health Insurance Tax Credit Rule

Tomorrow the Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements subcommittee of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is holding a hearing on “Oversight of IRS’s Legal Basis for Expanding ObamaCare’s Taxes and Subsidies.” The issue is whether the IRS rule purporting to extend tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies for the purchase of qualifying health insurance […]

Continue Reading 0

Forever Stamps

Will posts below about lifetime warranties, which reminds me about the postal service’s “forever stamps.” Forever? Really? That’s a long time. I don’t mean to cast any aspersions on the U.S. Postal Service when I express doubt that the stamps will really be usable forever. But maybe that’s just an occasion to mention one of […]

Continue Reading 0

Civil Unions and Federal Law

A commenter to my last DOMA/choice-of-law post asks– why not just have federal law recognize all state-law civil unions? Why insist that a legal union be labeled “marriage” to count federally as a marriage? There are two slightly different versions of this question, which in my view have different answers. Version one: Under current law, […]

Continue Reading 0

New Draft Article: The Next Generation Communications Privacy Act

I recently posted a new draft article, The Next Generation Communications Privacy Act, forthcoming in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. I wrote the draft during the winter and spring, before the Edward Snowden NSA disclosures, although some aspects of the Snowden disclosures echo the themes of the article. Note that this article is only […]

Continue Reading 0

Andrew McCarthy’s Fundamental Error

McCarthy: It is entirely understandable that libertarian-minded conservatives should distrust the Obama administration and resist endowing it with unnecessary additional powers. But the NSA programs are not new – they long predate Obama. And they are – the NSA, the administration, and informed members of Congress attest – highly effective efforts to map terror networks […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes