Author Archive | Dale Carpenter

The Second Circuit’s DOMA Decision

At the Federalist Society’s Supreme Court blog, I offer some thoughts on the Second Circuit’s decision in Windsor v. United States, which held the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.  The post concludes with a thought on what direction the Supreme Court might take when it confronts the constitutionality of DOMA: Even if the Court is […]

Continue Reading 0

David Blankenhorn’s Journey

David Blankenhorn wrote the book on opposition to gay marriage.  It was highly praised by the likes of Robert P. George, Stanley Kurtz, and Maggie Gallagher.  It was, I wrote at the time, the best single book making the case against SSM.  Later, David was the expert witness who defended Proposition 8 in the constitutional challenge to that […]

Continue Reading 0

Second Circuit Strikes Down DOMA Section 3

In a 2-1 opinion by Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs, a conservative appointed by the first President Bush, the Second Circuit has joined the unanimous chorus of federal courts striking down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages legalized by individual states.  The dissenter was Judge Chester Straub, who was appointed […]

Continue Reading 0

Speaking tomorrow

I’ll be speaking tomorrow on same-sex marriage before the student chapter of the Federalist Society at the Lewis and Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon. The event begins at Noon and will last one hour.  The student chapters of OUTLaw and the ACLU are co-sponsoring the speech.

Continue Reading 0

The Scalian Logic for Same-Sex Marriage

This week SCOTUSblog is hosting an online symposium about the Supreme Court’s consideration of litigation challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8.  My contribution begins: Constitutional law makes strange bedfellows. It can even unite supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage. Consider this: If Justice Scalia’s aggressive reading of Lawrence v. Texas (2003) […]

Continue Reading 0

What If the Supreme Court Doesn’t Accept Cert in the Prop 8 Case?

The question whether to accept certiorari in the Prop 8 case will come up at the Justices’ conference on September 24.  I think the Court will accept cert, so there won’t be any new same-sex marriages in California in the immediate future. But what if the Court refuses to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision striking […]

Continue Reading 0

Constitutional Law Professors: 87% Support Same-Sex Marriage, But Only 54% Believe It Is Constitutionally Mandated

Eighty-seven percent of constitutional law professors back marriage for same-sex couples, and 7 out of 10 believe the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, but only a slight majority of 54% think the federal Constitution requires states to recognize same-sex marriages. That’s the result of a survey of 485 constitutional law professors that I […]

Continue Reading 0

More on the “Tradeoffs” in Allowing SSM and Abolishing Slavery

Commenting on University of St. Thomas law professor Robert Delahunty’s recent op-ed, my colleague Richard Painter shares some thoughts on the subject of limiting the freedom of some people so that others may live in a world unstained by that particular freedom: Let’s put aside for the moment the fact that I don’t see such a tradeoff with abolition of slavery because […]

Continue Reading 0

Lincoln on “Liberty” and Slavery

Apropos the claim that slaveholders lost “freedom” when slavery was abolished, Eugene reminds me of what Abraham Lincoln said in his Address at a Sanitary Fair, in Baltimore, on April 18, 1864: The world has never had a good definition of liberty, and the American people, just now, are much in need of one. We all declare […]

Continue Reading 0

Slaveholders Lost Freedom Because of Emancipation, Argues Con Law Prof

University of St. Thomas Law Professor Robert Delahunty argues in this morning’s Minneapolis Star Tribune that “whenever the law expands the freedoms of one person or group, it necessarily contracts those of another.” Thus, he asserts that if gay couples are granted the freedom to marry, gay-marriage opponents will lose the freedom to live in a world without gay marriage […]

Continue Reading 0

Anonymity Granted to Catholic Donor Opposed to Marriage Amendment, But Amendment Supporters Object

In Minnesota, pro- and anti-gay marriage activists are fighting over political campaign disclosure laws, though this time the usual roles are reversed. On August 17, the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board ruled that the group working to defeat a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage does not have to disclose the name of a Catholic contributor to the […]

Continue Reading 0

Federal Judge in Hawaii Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Claim

In Hawaii, gay couples may enter civil unions with all the state-based rights and legal protections of marriage, but without the official designation of being “married.”  Same-sex couples sued to have the status of marriage, urging that they had a fundamental right to marry under the Due Process Clause and that the state could not […]

Continue Reading 0

David Blankenhorn Changes His Mind About SSM

Over the past few years, David Blankenhorn has been a leading intellectual opponent of same-sex marriage. In 2007, he published The Future of Marriage, which in my view is the most persuasive book opposing it.  In 2009 he was the leading testifier in favor of Prop 8 in the Perry litigation.  His view was never grounded in anti-gay attitudes, however. […]

Continue Reading 0

First Circuit Unanimously Strikes Down DOMA Section 3

The opinion is here.  The panel concluded that the Defense of Marriage Act, barring federal recognition of same-sex marriages, violates Equal Protection. On a quick reading, it appears the court applied “rational basis with bite” scrutiny based on the arguments that the exclusion (1) denied important federal rights and benefits to a small class of married couples, and […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes