Author Archive | Prof. Zachary Price, guest-blogging

Expanded Discretion: Criminal Justice and Immigration

The final problem of enforcement discretion is how executive officials should understand their role when enforcing federal criminal laws and other statutes that can’t possibly be fully enforced with available resources. Here recent debates over federal marijuana enforcement and immigration policy are key examples. As more and more states have legalized marijuana use either for […]

Continue Reading 0

Baseline Enforcement Discretion: The Affordable Care Act Waivers

In my last two posts, I’m going to apply my framework to some contemporary examples. Because I’m focusing on matters of current interest, these examples all come from the Obama Administration. As I indicated at the outset, however, aggressive use of non-enforcement to set policy is not unique to this administration. Recent Republican administrations have […]

Continue Reading 0

A Brief History of Enforcement Discretion

I’ve now laid out my basic framework for the scope of executive enforcement discretion: Congress is generally free to expand or contract executive non-enforcement power, but in the absence of such legislation the executive presumptively holds case-by-case non-enforcement authority but not categorical or prospective non-enforcement powers. I want to quickly address two points that came […]

Continue Reading 0

Defeasibility of Enforcement Discretion

As I explained in my last substantive post, I believe the Constitution prescribes two baseline presumptions regarding the scope of executive enforcement discretion — a presumption in favor of case-by-case non-enforcement authority, and a presumption against categorical or prospective non-enforcement for policy reasons. The boundary between case-by-case and categorical or prospective non-enforcement admittedly may not […]

Continue Reading 0

The Correct Framework for Executive Enforcement Discretion

So what is the correct framework for enforcement discretion? I believe the Constitution carries a central tension on this point, one that’s best resolved by the two presumptions I articulated at the outset — a presumption in favor of case-by-case discretion and a presumption against categorical or prospective non-enforcement for policy reasons. At the outset, […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes