Archive | Federalism

Letting the Bedbugs Bite

Once virtually eliminated in the United States, bedbugs are back with a vengeance.  Earlier this summer Environmental Protection Agency and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported the little pests had made an “alarming resurgence,” possibly due to increased resistance to available pesticides and a decline in local pest control programs.   Some pesticides once used for […]

Continue Reading 83

The Future of the European Union

The European Union has been one of the most interesting experiments in federalism of the post-World War II era. At present, the EU is a very weak federal government, if one can all it a government at all. In some ways, it is even weaker than US government was under the Articles of Confederation that […]

Continue Reading 74

The Individual Health Care Mandate and Enumerated Powers – Event Audio

The final event at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools was a Federalist Society panel on the constitutionality of the centralized health control law. Participants were Randy Barnett (Georgetown, VC), Jack Balkin (Yale),  Gillian Metzger (Columbia), and me (Denver, VC). The moderator was  Bradley A. Smith (Capital). Available here. The recording is 93 minutes, although the event itself ran […]

Continue Reading 30

My Washington Examiner Op Ed on The Recent Ruling in the Virginia Health Care Lawsuit

The Washington Examiner recently posted my op ed on Monday’s ruling in the Virginia health care lawsuit, which I previously discussed in this post: Monday’s federal district court decision refusing to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Obama health care plan is an important step forward for opponents of the plan. The suit […]

Continue Reading 29

Thoughts on the Federal District Court Ruling Refusing to Dismiss the Virginia Health Care Lawsuit

Federal District Judge Henry Hudson’s opinion refusing to dismiss Virginia’s lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Obama health care plan has several interesting aspects. The suit focuses primarily on a challenge to the “individual mandate” element of the plan, which requires most American citizens and legal residents to purchase a government-approved health insurance plan by […]

Continue Reading 397

Judge Won’t Dismiss Virginia Health Care Challenge

The Washington Post is reporting that a federal judge has denied the Obama Administration’s motion to dismiss Virginia’s constitutional challenge to the recently enacted health care reform law. UPDATE: Thanks to Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions, here’s the district court opinion.  It concludes: While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem […]

Continue Reading 40

Judge Enjoins Most of AZ Immigration Law

This morning, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton issued a preliminary injunction blocking key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law from taking effect on the grounds that these provisions are likely to be preempted by federal law.  The Arizona Republic reports: Key parts of Senate Bill 1070 that will not go into effect Thursday: •  The […]

Continue Reading 48

Are Asian Carp a “Public Nuisance”?

Five states filed suit against the federal government and Chicago yesterday, alleging that the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago have created a “public nuisance”  through the maintenance of water infrastructure (locks, intakes, etc.) that could enable the Asian carp to enter the Great Lakes (if they have […]

Continue Reading 16

Administration Now Says Individual Mandate Is a “Tax”

During the debate over health care reform, the Obama Administration steadfastly denied that a statutory penalty for failing to purchase a government-approved health insurance policy would constitute a “tax.”  The President himself categorically rejected the argument that the mandate is a tax in an ABC interview.  Now, however, the Administration is relying upon the federal […]

Continue Reading 206

DOMA case and the Tenth Amendment

Jack Balkin has an interesting post on today’s two Defense of Marriage Act cases from the federal District of Massachusetts, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, and Massachusetts v. HHS. The latter case found DOMA unconstitutional, as applied to Massachusetts, because DOMA violates the Tenth Amendment by infringing the state’s traditional core sovereign power of defining […]

Continue Reading 311

DOMA Section 3 Unconstitutional, Says Massachusetts District Court

That’s the decision this afternoon, based on equal protection principles applied to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.  Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 established a federal definition of marriage for the first time.  This meant that the federal government could refuse to grant validly married same-sex […]

Continue Reading 567

DoJ Files Suit Against Arizona Immigration Law

Yesterday the Justice Department filed suit against Arizona’s controversial immigration law, alleging that it is preempted by federal law and seeking an injunction against its enforcement.  The NYT reports: The Justice Department argues the law would divert federal and local law enforcement officers by making them focus on people who may not have committed crimes, […]

Continue Reading 203

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes