Archive | Freedom of Speech

Federal Government Acknowledges Constitutional Limits on Housing Discrimination Law

From the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Determination of No Reasonable Cause in Fair Housing Center of West Michigan v. [Redacted] (paragraph break added): [A]n individual complained to Complainant about a rental advertisement posted on a bulletin board at the [Redacted] Church … stat[ing] (in relevant part): “I am looking for a female christian […]

Continue Reading 25

Anti-Homosexuality Speech in High School Classes

From the Livingston (Mich.) Daily: Howell Public Schools Superintendent Ron Wilson on Thursday said high school teacher Jay McDowell was disciplined [by being suspended for one day without pay] after it was determined McDowell violated a student’s First Amendment rights and significantly violated a district policy. “The student was speaking out on being offended by […]

Continue Reading 563

Vulcans and Video Games at the Supreme Court

Josh Blackman has posted some fascinating excerpts from the oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. EMA, the violent video games case. I’ll leave the analytical heavy lifting to our resident free speech experts, such as Eugene. My own view (uncharacteristically in line with conventional wisdom) is that the state government should lose this case and probably […]

Continue Reading 52

Virginia’s Worst University Speech Code?

Richmond Times-Dispatch columnist Barton Hinkle has a column surveying speech codes at Virginia public universities {HT: co-blogger Todd Zywicki]. It turns out that George Mason University may have the worst of a bad lot: Free speech is one of those values to which everyone gives lip service. Nearly no one considers himself pro-censorship. Yet as […]

Continue Reading 71

“That Would Be Very Nice”

Quintessential Justice Scalia, from the oral argument in the First Amendment violent video games case: JUSTICE GINSBURG: Is there — you’ve been asked questions about the vagueness of this and the problem for the seller to know what’s good and what’s bad. California — does California have any kind of an advisory opinion, an office […]

Continue Reading 91

North Carolina Department of Revenue’s Demand for Amazon Customer Records Violates the First Amendment

So holds Amazon.com v. Lay (W.D. Wash., decided yesterday): Amazon pursues summary judgment as to its First Amendment claim that the DOR’s request for all information related to Amazon’s sales to North Carolina residents violates the First Amendment. The Court agrees and GRANTS the motion. The First Amendment protects a buyer from having the expressive […]

Continue Reading 74

Christian in South Asian Country Sentenced to Prison for “Attempting to Promote Civil Unrest” by Screening Pro-Christianity Movies

From Kuensel Online (“Bhutan’s daily news site”): Gelephu dungkhag court sentenced last week a 40-year old man to three years in prison for attempting to promote civil unrest. Prem Singh Gurung from Tarithang was arrested on May 21, after villagers in Gonggaon and Simkharkha of Jigmecholing gewog complained that he was screening movies on Christianity […]

Continue Reading 10

DePaul University Says No to Pro-Marijuana-Legalization Group

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has the details. The university admits that it is excluding the group from generally available student group registration benefits, because the university disapproves of the group’s message: Considerable research indicates the use of cannabis does not contribute to healthy decision-making, particularly in college-age populations. Given the above, the […]

Continue Reading 48

Should Taboos Be Taboo?

MIT psychologist Steven Pinker recently delivered an interesting speech to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education where he argued that we should be extremely skeptical about taboos on the expression of various views [HT: Michael Rappaport]: Today, I think it is the scientific study of the mind that people tend to blend with deep […]

Continue Reading 181

Ban on References to Deities on License Plates = Unconstitutional Viewpoint Discrimination

So holds today’s Second Circuit decision in Byrne v. Rutledge: At issue here is the state ban on any combination [of letters and numbers on a personalized license plate] that “refer[s], in any language, to a … religion” or “deity.” Id. § 304(d)(4). The asserted purpose of the ban is to avoid the “distraction and […]

Continue Reading 26

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes