Archive | September, 2004

Something worth producing:

With all the apparent media gaffes in Rathergate, it would be helpful if someone put up a page listing (1) each error or likely error by a major media outlet, (2) an explanation of why it’s an error, preferably with links to evidence that it’s an error, (3) a description of what the media outlet […]

Continue Reading

Vanity Fair Publishes Inside Scoop on Bush v. Gore:

The October 2004 Vanity Fair has hit the newsstands, and it offers an insider’s view of what happened in Bush v. Gore. (It’s not online, unfortunately; yes, I actually had to plunk down $4.50 for a very glossy paper copy.) To be more precise, the article offers the view of a group of the law […]

Continue Reading

LibraryLaw, plus GayHawaii:

Just ran across LibraryLaw Blog, an interesting blog focused on law and libraries. Definitely worth checking out. Here’s one interesting story the blog points to: [The ACLU] filed a lawsuit on behalf of Carlos Hernandez, a Honolulu man who said he was banned from the Hawaii State Library for a year for using its computers […]

Continue Reading

More on forgery:

A bunch of people e-mailed me to say that surely forging a letter from a military officer, which ostensibly came from a military file, must violate some federal statute, and not just the couple of state election law statutes I mentioned here. Well, that was my intuition, too, but a quick search didn’t reveal any […]

Continue Reading

Forgery of documents intended to be used in an election:

If the Killian letters (the ones that purport to relate to aspects of President Bush’s National Guard service) are indeed forged, the forger might be criminally prosecuted. My sense is that most forgery statutes don’t apply to frauds aimed at influencing votes, rather than to getting money or property or the like. I might be […]

Continue Reading

Dr. Amy Sisley reports having been misquoted by Reuters:

I just heard back from Dr. Sisley, who was quoted by Reuters about spinal cord injuries and firearms (see this post). She reports that what she told Reuters — and what Reuters should have said — is that 90 percent of spinal cord injuries caused by violence (which are a minority of all spinal cord […]

Continue Reading

Monolingualism:

Scott Martens (Fistful of Euros) criticizes Dan Pipes, arguing that he misrepresents certain French-language writings by Tariq Ramadan. In passing, he also mentions: Monolingualism has costs. Eugene Volokh, for example, has posted a link to Pipes’ piece but says that he does not know the facts of the case well enough to judge. Ted over […]

Continue Reading

Document Disclosure:

I don’t care much about Swift Vets, Winter Soldiers, Air National Guard stories or draft deferments. I am more concerned about what a prospective President will do over the next four years than what he may have done (or not done) decades ago. And I have no idea what to think about this new bombshell, […]

Continue Reading

More on eminent domain and the Michigan Supreme Court:

Professor John Mogk wanted to jump in again to the thread we had on the subject in August; the latest entry was Ilya Somin’s post, which links back to the older posts, and here’s Professor Mogk’s response: OVERRULING POLETOWN On August 17 I replied to Professor Somin’s comments posted on August 9, 2004, regarding my […]

Continue Reading

Does Failing to Deliver E-Mail Violate the Wiretap Act?:

In about two weeks, the Second Circuit will hold oral argument in the case of Hall v. Earthlink. In this case, an ISP cut off access to a customer’s e-mail account after wrongly concluding that the customer was a spammer. It took six days for the ISP to realize the error and apologize; rather than […]

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes