Archive | November, 2009

In Memoriam: Mike Weston

I learned recently that my law school classmate Michael Weston was one of the DEA agents killed last week in Afghanistan in the helicopter crash following a drug raid that killed all ten on board. Here’s a story about him from his hometown paper. I wanted to say a few words about Mike. He was […]

Continue Reading

The California versus Texas Model, and Public Choice

William Voegeli, a contributing editor at The Claremont Review of Books, has an excellent essay in Manhattan Journal comparing the economic performance of California and Texas.  (I believe a short opinion page version appeared recently in the LAT.)  Among other things, the article provides a good example for how a public choice analysis can be […]

Continue Reading 104

Lobster, Artichoke, and Avocado Salad

An impromptu recipe from dealing with leftovers this past weekend: 1. Combine — in roughly equal amounts — pieces of steamed lobster, chopped steamed artichoke hearts (not marinated), and chopped avocado. 2. Add a bit of mayonnaise. 3. Mix and serve. Worked quite well, I think.

Continue Reading 13

The Origins of Security Screening at Airports

Some readers may be familiar with the origins of airport security screening. I wasn’t, however, and the history is pretty interesting.  In the 1960s, airplane hijacking became surprisingly common: The first skyjacking of a United States airliner occurred in May, 1961 with Cuba as the destination. Thus, a reverse flow of refugees from non-Communist to […]

Continue Reading 45

Duties to Report, and Duties to Testify

I note below one argument against duties to promptly report crimes that you’ve witnessed. (I speak here about such duties imposed on the public at large, rather than on particular professionals.) More broadly, I generally don’t support such duties. I should note, though, that such duties are not conceptually far different from duties to testify […]

Continue Reading 55

The Second Circuit Dismisses Arar Rendition Case, En Banc

My Opinio Juris colleague Julian Ku comments on the dismissal of the Maher Arar rendition case by the Second Circuit in an en banc decision, 7-4.  (Arar is the case of the Canadian who was detained by the US and subjected to extraordinary rendition to Syria.)  Like Julian, and perhaps more strongly, I think the […]

Continue Reading

How Statistics Get Distorted — An Example

On a legal academic discussion list, someone said — quoting the Brady Campaign that “In two thirds of battered women’s households that contained a firearm, the intimate partner used the gun against the woman, usually threatening to shoot/kill her (71.4 percent) or to shoot at her (5.1 percent).” Given that there are a lot of […]

Continue Reading 76

Will the Arms Trade Treaty provide effective embargos on human rights violators?

Reversing the position of the Bush administration, the Obama administration recently announced support for the global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which is currently being drafted by the United Nations. The leading voices for the ATT are the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA, funded by George Soros, and run by the Open Society’s former gun control […]

Continue Reading 12

IJ’s Bone Marrow Case: An Intro

Thanks Eugene for letting me guest-blog this week about the Institute for Justice’s latest case: the first ever constitutional challenge to the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA).  [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOO2kQZbqB0[/youtube]We’re asking the courts to enjoin the Attorney General from enforcing the provision of NOTA that makes it a serious crime to compensate bone marrow donors. I’ll use […]

Continue Reading 87

Jotwell

Prof. Michael Froomkin (Discourse.net) is launching a new project that sounds extremely helpful: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) — JOTWELL — invites you to join us in filling a telling gap in legal scholarship by creating a space where legal academics will go to identify, celebrate, and discuss the best new legal scholarship. […]

Continue Reading 5

What Kind of People Affiliate with Human Rights Watch’s Middle East Division?

This kind: Helena Cobban is on the Board of Directors of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East and North Africa Division.  In a recent blog post, she took exception to the Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb criticizing her because “she likes to compare Israel to Hamas.” (H/T: Richard Landes) Cobban was offended not because Goldfarb was wrong, […]

Continue Reading 80

Does the UN Human Rights Council cause states to treat their citizens better than they otherwise would?

Continuing our exchange, Henry Farrell says that the answer is likely yes, noting that “there is good evidence that the HRC’s predecessor, the even more widely excoriated UN Commission on Human Rights did have a measurable, and arguably positive, effect in punishing notorious human rights violators, despite its many flaws.”  He cites two empirical papers […]

Continue Reading 13

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes