Archive | 2010

“A Sickly Brood of Judicial Fancies”

From Martin v. Bear, 5 Penn. L.J. Reps. 17 (Ct. Com. Pl. 1851), the court rejected “the suggestion that courts of original jurisdiction ought not to investigate constitutional questions, but should, without scruple, execute every act of the legislature, however unjust and unconstitutional, and thus leave the injured party to seek his remedy, as best […]

Continue Reading 12

Wearing Alexander McQueen, Reading Charles Dickens

An interesting post from Prof. Geoffrey Pullum (Language Log) (which he posted two weeks ago): Sex and the City 2 premiered in London last night. Sarah Jessica Parker arrived in a black strapless dress from the house of her favorite British designer, and what she told her fans provided another interesting example of what Mark […]

Continue Reading 15

More on Judicial Activism

At Reason.com, Damon Root situates the judicial activism debate in the context of conservatism and libertarianism in this lengthy and thoughtful piece that is well worth reading in its entirety. Here is a taste: “Judicial review is doubtless the main issue that separates conservative and libertarian jurisprudes,” says Roger Pilon, an influential legal thinker who […]

Continue Reading

Marcus Cole on Elena Kagan

Over on Pileus Stanford law professor–and new blogger–Marcus Cole provides his measured take on Elena Kagan’s nomination. You should read the whole thing, but here is his bottom line: What does distinguish Kagan, however, is her track record as Dean at Harvard Law School, particularly with respect to the recruitment of conservative faculty. Contrary to […]

Continue Reading

Nine Puzzles of Space and Time

My friend Haym Hirsh developed these puzzles for G4G9, the ninth Gathering for [Martin] Gardner, and kindly agreed to let me blog them: Martin Gardner’s relative Dr. Art Renaming traveled widely across the U.S. and the world. Art maintained a diary in which he described some of the puzzling circumstances he experienced over the course […]

Continue Reading 129

God Forbid That Some For-Profit Business Should Benefit While You Help People

This morning, I suggested that people who find errors in a Westlaw or Lexis version of a document help their fellow users by e-mailing the correction to west.referenceattorneys@thomson.com or source.acquisition@lexisnexis.com. I suggested that this is especially nice if it’s an error that confused you or risked leading you into an error of your own — […]

Continue Reading 95

Fixing Errors in Westlaw and Lexis Versions of Documents

If you run across an error in a Westlaw or Lexis version of a document, help your fellow users by e-mailing the correction to west.referenceattorneys@thomson.com or source.acquisition@lexisnexis.com. This is especially so if it’s an error that confused you or risked leading you into an error of your own — once you’ve figured out the problem, […]

Continue Reading 29

Defamation by Government Still Political Question

Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, dismissed a lawsuit against the federal government by owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant targeted by a U.S. missile strike on political question grounds.  Judge Griffith wrote the opinion for the court in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States, which begins: […]

Continue Reading 56

“Judicial Activism” – The Podcast

It seems that everyone’s against “judicial activism,” but what does it mean?  Does labeling a judge or decision “activist” indicate anything more than disagreement with the outcome?  Is it fair to label a judge or judicial nominee “activist”?  The Federalist Society has just posted a podcast debate on these questions featuring our own Randy Barnett, […]

Continue Reading 39

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes