Archive | 2010

Ted Olson’s Case for Gay Marriage

Ted Olson explains why he supports gay marriage and has joined with David Boies to file suit to support it. Many of my fellow conservatives have an almost knee-jerk hostility toward gay marriage. This does not make sense, because same-sex unions promote the values conservatives prize. Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of […]

Continue Reading 291

Another Biomass Blunder

The federal government’s love affair with ethanol subsidies drove up food prices, depleted plains state aquifers and subsidized the destruction of water fowl habitat.  Today’s Washington Post reports that that Biomass Crop Assistance Program is having similarly untoward and unintended consequences. In a matter of months, the Biomass Crop Assistance Program — a small provision […]

Continue Reading 16

Sunday Song Lyric

It’s cold and gray in northeast Ohio.  The snow’s stopped, but everything’s still blanketed in white.  Still, it’s not such a bad place to be.  I’m reminded of the opening line of “Winter Passing” by The Academy Is . . . (Yes, their name includes the elipsis.)  “Winter Passing” was released as a single in […]

Continue Reading 2

Firebombing of Churches in Malaysia

From the AP: Firebombs were thrown at three more churches in Malaysia on Sunday and another was splashed with black paint, the latest in a series of assaults on Christian houses of worship following a court decision allowing non-Muslims to use “Allah” to refer to God…. [G]overnment leaders and many Muslims have condemned the firebombings, […]

Continue Reading 24

Request for Comments on a Draft Amicus Brief in the Strandlof Stolen Valor Act Case

I decided to take up the court’s open invitation to file amicus briefs in this case (follow the link if you want more facts); the Rutherford Institute has also apparently decided to do the same. Since the filing date has been extended by several days, I thought I’d post a fairly early draft of the […]

Continue Reading 23

Friends of the Court

From Strasser v. Doorley, 432 F.2d 567 (1st Cir. 1970): [B]y the nature of things an amicus is not normally impartial. [Footnote:] As an attorney of our acquaintance once told the court, when asked for his response to the argument of the amicus, ‘That fellow isn’t any more a friend of the court than I […]

Continue Reading 10

More Predator Drone Debate, in the Wall Street Journal, and What the Obama Administration Should Do as a Public Legal Position

The Wall Street Journal has a weekend editorial on the same topic as my National Journal post below, Drone Wars, January 9, 2010.  Interestingly, I find myself believing that the WSJ editorial gets it, if not precisely wrong, at least puts the emphasis exactly backwards.  The WSJ editorial is primarily concerned to defend the “war” frame […]

Continue Reading 68

Inmate Suicide Case Likely Headed to the Supreme Court?

The case is Conn v. City of Reno, in which seven judges dissented from denial of rehearing en banc; Judge Kozinski wrote the dissent, and Judge Reinhardt wrote the panel opinion. According to the dissent, the panel opinion creates a conflict with other circuits. My guess is that there’s a very substantial chance of a […]

Continue Reading 45

National Journal on Targeted Killing and Predator Drone Strikes

(Update:  Thanks, Glenn, for the Instalanche!  Please see the further post above, on what I think the US legal position ought to be – what the Obama administration should be stating as its view of the relevant international law, and how I think the WSJ’s op-ed today in defense of drone strikes is not actually […]

Continue Reading 167

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes