Archive | August, 2013

Can For-Profit Corporations Have Religious Purposes?

Expanding on Will’s post from Wednesday (and his prior post here), it seems to me the argument that corporations, as such, cannot press religious liberty claims (or, to put it another way, cannot “exercise” religion) is wholly unsustainable.  As Will notes, a consequence of this position would be the denial of religious liberty claims made by churches. […]

Continue Reading 0

The Behavior of Nonprofits

I’ve randomly come across two stories that illustrate a truism about “nonprofits”–their leaders often act a lot like leaders of for-profit organizations, seeking to expand market share and the like. In particular, it’s well-known that non-profits very rarely declare their mission to be over and wind up operations. The famous example is the March of […]

Continue Reading 0

The most awesomest judge…

…must have been the English judge Mr Justice Maule, who used a bigamy case to comment on the embarrassing state of marriage and divorce law in 1845: Prisoner at the bar, you have been convicted before me of what the law regards as a very grave and serious offence: that of going through the marriage […]

Continue Reading 0

My Whereabouts and the Coming Academic Year

As some of you have guessed, my family had to cut our stay in Lima, Peru short. Everything’s fine, but we had some medical issues that were better treated in the U.S. So, I’m back in Virginia. It was too late to undo my academic leave for 2013-14, however, so I’ll be on leave from […]

Continue Reading 0

A Knowledgeable but Selfish Electorate May be Better than a Well-Meaning but Ignorant One

In my last post, I discussed economist Dwight R. Lee’s article about why most of the electorate does not decide who to vote for on the basis of narrow self-interest. Unfortunately, the very same incentive structure that leads most voters to base their decisions on the public interest also leads most of them to be […]

Continue Reading 0

NSA Screening International E-mails and Texts for Foreign Intelligence Information

Charlie Savage has a significant article in the NY Times about the scope of NSA surveillance involving people inside the United States and outside the United States. In 50 U.S.C. 1881a(a), Congress approved surveillance via “the targeting of persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information.” That authorization […]

Continue Reading 0

Selfish Voters are Not the Problem that Ails Democracy

Both right and left have standard stories explaining how selfish voters often prevent the government from adopting good policies. The right-wing story – made famous by Mitt Romney’s much-derided “47 percent” speech last year – is that voters become dependent on government transfer programs and then support those programs despite the harm they cause to […]

Continue Reading 0

Lawsuit Challenges Richmond, CA’s Plan to Use Eminent Domain to Condemn Mortgages

A group of bond investors has filed a lawsuit challenging the California City of Richmond’s plan to use eminent domain to condemn mortgages: Bond investors including Pacific Investment Management Co. and BlackRock Inc. (BLK) are seeking a court order blocking Richmond, California, and Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC from seizing mortgages through eminent domain, saying the […]

Continue Reading 0

Court Rejects Religious Discrimination Claim Based on Associated Press’s Rejection of Plaintiff’s Religiously Themed Article

From Mehdi v. Comm’n on Human Rights & Opportunities (Conn. Ct. App. official release date Aug. 13, 2013): [T]he plaintiff filed a discrimination complaint against Thomas Curly/Associated Press, alleging that he had been denied services based, in part, on his religious beliefs in violation of [the Connecticut ban on discrimination in places of public accommodation]. […]

Continue Reading 0

Do Corporations Have a Right to Sell Kosher Meat?

I’ve seen some skeptical responses to my previous post about corporations and free exercise, of which Dahlia Lithwick’s and David Gans’s are emblematic. My point, recall, was that the Third Circuit’s logic led to the conclusion that churches don’t have free exercise rights, and that even though the Third Circuit said that that didn’t have […]

Continue Reading 0

Second Circuit Reverses Judge Weinstein in Poker Case

A year ago, I had a short post on a new decision interpreting the federal gambling laws: Is Playing Texas Hold’ Em a Form of Gambling? No, rules Judge Jack Weinstein, at least for purposes of the Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA), 18 U.S.C. § 1955, because Texas Hold’em “is not predominately a game of […]

Continue Reading 0

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes