Archive | Gay Marriage

Proposition 8 Through the Prism of Lawrence v. Texas

The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Perry v. Brown pushes hard to apply Romer v. Evans to the Prop 8 litigation.  The panel noted that the grant of full marital and parental rights to same-sex couples, while simultaneously denying them the word “marriage,” excised gay couples and their children with “surgical precision.” But such narrowness was not the problem in Romer; it […]

Continue Reading 261

More on Gay Marriage Bans and Judicial Minimalism

In a thoughtful recent post, co-blogger Dale Carpenter takes issue with my argument that bans on same-sex marriage are best attacked on the grounds that they are unconstitutional sex discrimination, and parts of my post suggesting that a minimalist strategy in the gay marriage litigation is not likely to work. Dale is one of the […]

Continue Reading 170

Sex Discrimination and Tradition

In a recent post, co-blogger David Bernstein partially rejects my argument that a ban on same-sex marriage qualifies as sex discrimination. As David puts it: On the one hand, I agree with Ilya that bans on same-sex marriage could be described as sex discrimination. On the other hand, from opponents’ perspective, the point is that […]

Continue Reading 362

On Same Sex Marriage and “Sex Discrimination”

On the one hand, I agree with Ilya that bans on same-sex marriage could be described as sex discrimination.  On the other hand, from opponents’ perspective, the point is that “marriage” has been defined for several thousand years in Judeo-Christian culture as between a man and a woman, and retaining that definition is not sex […]

Continue Reading 223

Judicial Minimalism and Same-Sex Marriage

Co-blogger Dale Carpenter argues that Judge Stephen Reinhardt’s recent decision striking down the California gay marriage ban is an attempt at “judicial minimalism” intended to make the outcome acceptable to a Supreme Court that is unlikely to rule that the Constitution requires nation-wide recognition of same-sex marriage. By “lowering the stakes,” Dale argues, Reinhardt gives […]

Continue Reading 157

Reinhardt’s Minimalism, Lowering the Stakes

In contrast to Judge Walker’s maximalist opinion striking down Prop 8, it’s generally accepted that Judge Reinhardt’s opinion was minimalist. There’s a commonsense way in which the opinion is not at all minimalist. It reverses the results of a plebiscite, which followed the expenditure of $80 million and the mobilization of millions of voters. It brings […]

Continue Reading 251

Why Same-Sex Marriage Bans Qualify as Sex Discrimination

Today’s Ninth Circuit decision striking down California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage is unpersuasive because it claims that the law fails to meet even minimal “rational basis” scrutiny. Eugene Volokh does a good job of explaining why. But there is an alternative constitutional rationale for striking down same-sex marriage bans that avoids this problem. Proposition […]

Continue Reading 439

Place Your Bets

The Ninth Circuit’s opinion on the constitutionality of Prop 8 is expected tomorrow.  Chris Geidner summarizes the issues the panel may address: The long anticipated appeals court ruling is expected to address three issues: (1) whether former U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker should have recused himself from hearing the case because he is gay and had […]

Continue Reading 269

Marriage For Me But Not For Thee

John Corvino, a philosophy professor, notes a potential complication for Newt Gingrich’s claim that he has repented, namely, that he continues to commit adultery in the form of remarriage: Gingrich speaks with a straight face about the sanctity of “one man, one woman” marriage. . .  His defenders from the religious right . . . claim that Jesus offers forgiveness and redemption […]

Continue Reading

Santorum the Sophist

Conor Friedersdorf has a pretty good take-down of Rick Santorum’s reasons for opposing same-sex marriage.  Friedersdorf evidently supports same-sex marriage for culturally conservative reasons (praising marriage and its value to families, wanting to preserve it).  Santorum’s argument against same-sex marriage, on the other hand, is little more than an assertion of authority and definition.  Santorum writes: A […]

Continue Reading

Debate with Maggie Gallagher, Round 467

This time we were debating a proposed amendment to the Minnesota state constitution banning same-sex marriages, although the focus was on the merits of same-sex marriage itself.  The debate was held at the University of St. Thomas Law School in Minneapolis and was hosted by the Terence J. Murphy Institute for Catholic Thought, Law and Public […]

Continue Reading

Symposium on Same-Sex Marriage

This week and next, SCOTUSblog is hosting an online symposium on various aspects of the litigation challenging California’s Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act.  The expected contributors are well-known combatants in the ongoing national debate over gay marriage:  Carlos Ball, Bob Barr, Thomas Berg, Erwin Chemerinsky, David Cruz, William C. Duncan, John Eastman, William Eskridge, […]

Continue Reading

The Administration’s DOMA Brief

Last Friday, the Justice Department filed its merits brief in Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, arguing against dismissal of the suit challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [A brief in defense of DOMA and urging dismissal was filed on behalf of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of […]

Continue Reading 105

Civil Unions Begin in Illinois

They’re not quite registering June brides, but the joyous end of American civilization has legislatively spread to Cook County and the rest of the Land of Lincoln. Starting today, the state is granting all of the rights and privileges of marriage under state law to same-sex couples.  With all the recent excitement in Minnesota over the effort to […]

Continue Reading 136

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes